Justification of Manufacturing Systems
Possibility distributions are recommended for explicit representation of uncertainty in models used for justification of manufacturing systems. A procedure is presented that is capable of obtaining and combining the possibility distributions of strategic and economic aspects of an investment situation. A numerical example is presented, and a method of ranking alternatives is discussed.
KeywordsCash Flow Justification Procedure Interval Arithmetic Possibility Distribution Justification Process
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bavishi, V.B., “Capital Budgeting Practices at Multinationals,” Management Accounting, August, pp. 32–35 (1981).Google Scholar
- 2.Behrens, A.M. and F. Choobineh, “Can Economic Uncertainty Always be Described by Randomness?” Proceedings of IIE Conference, Toronto, pp. 116-120(1989).Google Scholar
- 4.CAM-I, Inc., “Management Accounting in Advanced Manufacturing Environments,” Arlington, TX, 32 Pages (1988).Google Scholar
- 5.Canada, J. and W. Sullivan, Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Prentice Hall, (1989).Google Scholar
- 6.Choobineh, F., “Modeling Uncertainty in Economic Justifications of Manufacturing Systems,” Proceeding of IIE Integrated System Conference, Atlanta, pp. 605-611 (1989).Google Scholar
- 8.Falter, B. and F. Choobineh, “CAM Economic Justification — A Case Study in Electronic Industry,” in Productivity and Quality Improvement in Electronics Assembly, McGraw-Hill, pp. 523–535 (1988).Google Scholar
- 10.Grablowsky, B J. and W.L. Burns, “The Application of Capital Allocation Techniques by Small Business,” Journal of Small Business Management, 18, 3, pp. 50–67 (1980).Google Scholar
- 11.Kaplan, S.K., “Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?” Harvard Business Review, March–April, pp. 87-95 (1986).Google Scholar