Skip to main content

Justification of Manufacturing Systems

  • Conference paper
Material Handling ’90

Part of the book series: Progress in Material Handling and Logistics ((LOGISTICS,volume 2))

  • 415 Accesses

Abstract

Possibility distributions are recommended for explicit representation of uncertainty in models used for justification of manufacturing systems. A procedure is presented that is capable of obtaining and combining the possibility distributions of strategic and economic aspects of an investment situation. A numerical example is presented, and a method of ranking alternatives is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bavishi, V.B., “Capital Budgeting Practices at Multinationals,” Management Accounting, August, pp. 32–35 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behrens, A.M. and F. Choobineh, “Can Economic Uncertainty Always be Described by Randomness?” Proceedings of IIE Conference, Toronto, pp. 116-120(1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benzion, V. and J. Yagil, “On the Discounting Formula for a Stream of Independent Risky Cash Flows,” The Engineering Economist, 32, pp. 337–345 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CAM-I, Inc., “Management Accounting in Advanced Manufacturing Environments,” Arlington, TX, 32 Pages (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canada, J. and W. Sullivan, Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Prentice Hall, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Choobineh, F., “Modeling Uncertainty in Economic Justifications of Manufacturing Systems,” Proceeding of IIE Integrated System Conference, Atlanta, pp. 605-611 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong, W. and H.C. Shah, “Vertex Method for Computing Functions of Fuzzy Variables,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 14, pp. 65–78 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Falter, B. and F. Choobineh, “CAM Economic Justification — A Case Study in Electronic Industry,” in Productivity and Quality Improvement in Electronics Assembly, McGraw-Hill, pp. 523–535 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fama, E.F., “Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates and Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty,” Journal of Financial Economcs, 5, pp. 3–24 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grablowsky, B J. and W.L. Burns, “The Application of Capital Allocation Techniques by Small Business,” Journal of Small Business Management, 18, 3, pp. 50–67 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, S.K., “Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?” Harvard Business Review, March–April, pp. 87-95 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S.H. and T. Crick, “Foreign Capital Budgeting Practices Used by the U.S. and Non-U.S. Multinational Companies,” The Engineering Economist, 29, 3, pp. 207–215 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, R.E., Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis, SIAM, Philadelphia (1979).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pike, R., “Do Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Approaches Improve Investment Decision-Making Effectiveness?” The Engineering Economist, 34, 2, pp. 149–161 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robicheck, A.A. and S.G. Myers, “Use of Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates,” Journal of Finance, 21, pp. 727–730 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tseng, X.Y. and C.M. Klein, “New Algorithm for the Ranking Procedure in Fuzzy Decision Making,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 5, pp. 1289–1296 (1989).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Yager, R.R., “Fuzzy Design Making Including Unequal Objectives,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, pp. 87–95 (1978).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy Sets,” Info. Control 8, pp. 338–353 (1965).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, L.A., “Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, pp. 3–28 (1978).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Choobineh, F. (1991). Justification of Manufacturing Systems. In: Material Handling ’90. Progress in Material Handling and Logistics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84356-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84356-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84356-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics