Transportation with Common Carrier and Private Fleets: System Assignment and Shipment Frequency Optimization

  • Randolph W. Hall
  • Michael Racer
Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Material Handling and Logistics book series (LOGISTICS, volume 2)


In this chapter, a shipment can either be served by a private carrier or a common carrier. The cost of using the private carrier declines as the space between stops decreases. Therefore, if more stops are assigned to private carriage, the cost of adding another stop will decline. The methodology presented in this chapter for assigning stops to private and common carriage accounts for this cost interaction through use of a square-root route length approximation. Techniques are presented for systems with (1) fixed shipping cycle for all stops with a variable fleet size, (2) fixed shipping cycle for all stops with a fixed fleet size, and (3) variable shipping cycles with a variable fleet size. In the last case, the optimal time between shipments accounts for both transportation and inventory costs.


Material Handling Vehicle Route Fleet Size Generalize Assignment Problem Service Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ballou, R.H. and M. Chowdhury “MSVS: An Extended Computer Model for Transport Mode Selection,” Logistics and Transportation Review, 16, pp. 325–338 (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blumenfeld, D.E., L.D. Burns, J.D. Diltz and C.F. Daganzo “Analyzing Trade-Offs Between Transportation, Inventory and Production Costs on Freight Networks,” Transportation Research, 19B, pp. 361–380 (1985).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daganzo, C.F. “The Length of Tours in Zones of Different Shapes,” Transportation Research, 18B, pp. 135–146 (1984).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daganzo, C.F. “Supplying a Single Location from Heterogeneous Sources,” Transportation Research, 19B, pp. 409–420 (1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dror, M. and P. Trudeau “Savings by Split Delivery Routes,” Transportation Science, 23, pp. 141–145 (1989).CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hall, R.W. “Determining Vehicle Dispatch Frequency When Shipping Frequency Differs Among Suppliers,” Transportation Research, 19B, pp. 421–431 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall, R.W. “Vehicle Packing,” Transportation Research, 23B, pp. 103–121 (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jordan, W.C “Analyzing Shipping Strategies for Suppliers Shipping to a Single Plant,” General Motors Research Laboratories, GMR-6652 (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Racer, M.J. “Coordinating Inbound and Outbound Vehicle Routes Within a Decentralized Decision Environment,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randolph W. Hall
    • 1
  • Michael Racer
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Memphis State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations