Physiological Criteria in Screening and Breeding

  • A. R. Yeo
Part of the Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics book series (GENETICS, volume 21)

Abstract

The great majority of plant improvements to date has been achieved on the basis of characteristics which can be clearly seen (e.g. shape and size) or which can be quantified directly (e.g. yield). So why might it be necessary to consider physiological characteristics which are not visible, and why is it necessary to measure anything other than yield, which is, after all, the prime objective? Breeding plants for problem soils, and indeed for tolerance to many environmental stresses, presents situations in which visible plant characteristics do not provide sufficient information for the plant breeder and in which yield is not an efficient index of the potential of parent lines. The purpose of this chapter is to examine the reasons for this.

Keywords

Zinc Sugar Permeability Toxicity Maize 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akbar M (1986) Breeding for salinity tolerance in rice. In: IRRI (ed) Salt–affected soils of Pakistan, India and Thailand. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp 39–63Google Scholar
  2. Bandyopadhyay AK (1988) Performance of some acid tolerant rice varieties in two acid saline soils of Sunderbans. Int Rice Res Newsl 13 (3): 19Google Scholar
  3. Bender J, Tingey DT, Jager HJ, Rodecap KD, Clark CS (1991) Physiological and biochemical responses of bush bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris) to ozone and drought stress. J Plant Physiol 137: 565–570Google Scholar
  4. Besford RT (1978) Effect of replacing nutrient potassium by sodium on uptake and distribution of sodium in tomato plants. Plant Soil 58: 427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya NC, Hileman DR, Ghosh PP, Musser RL, Bhattacharya S, Biswas PK (1990) Interaction of enriched C02 and water stress on the physiology of and biomass production in sweet potato grown in open-top chambers. Plant Cell Environ 13: 933–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blum A (1989) Breeding methods for drought resistance. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB (eds) Plants under stress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blum A, Mayer J, Golan G (1988) The effect of grain number per ear (sink size) on sourceGoogle Scholar
  8. activity and its water-relations in wheat. J Exp Bot 39: 106–114Google Scholar
  9. Blum A, Ramaiah S, Kanemasu ET, Paulsen GM (1990) The physiology of heterosis in Sorghum with respect to environmental stress. Ann Bot 65: 149–158Google Scholar
  10. Boursier P, Lauchli A (1989) Mechanisms of chloride partitioning in the leaves of salt-stressed Sorghum bicolor L. Physiol Plant 77: 537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cakmak I, Marschner H (1988) Increase in membrane permeability and exudation in roots of zinc deficient plants. J Plant Physiol 132: 356–361Google Scholar
  12. Castro-Jimenez Y, Newton RJ, Price HJ, Halliwell RS (1989) Drought stress responses of Microseris species differing in nuclear DNA content. Am J Bot 76: 789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Condon AG, Richards RA, Farquhar GD (1987) Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field–grown wheat. Crop Sci 27: 996–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cuartero J, Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1992) Selection of donors for salt tolerance in tomato using physiological traits. New Phytol 121: 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cutler JM, Rains DM, Loomis RS (1975) The importance of cell size in the water relations of plants. Plant Physiol 40: 255–260Google Scholar
  16. Devine TE (1982) Genetic fitting of crops to problem soils. In: Christiansen MN, Lewis CF (eds) Breeding plants for less favourable environments. Wiley, New York, pp 143–174Google Scholar
  17. Erdei L, Trivedi S, Takeda K, Matsumoto H (1990) Effects of osmotic and salt stresses on the accumulation of polyamines in leaf segments from wheat varieties differing in salt and drought tolerance. J Plant Physiol 137: 165–168Google Scholar
  18. Farquhar GD, Richards RA (1984) Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Aust J Plant Physiol 11: 539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farquhar GD, Wong SC, Evans JR, Hubick KT (1989) Photosynthesis and gas exchange. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB (eds) Plants under stress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finch RP, Slamer IH, Cocking EC (1990) Production of heterokaryones by the fusion of mesophyll protoplasts of Porteresia coarctata and cell suspension-derived protoplasts of Oryza sativa: a new approach to somatic hybridisation in rice. J Plant Physiol 136: 592–598Google Scholar
  21. Flowers TJ, Dalmond D (1992) Protein synthesis in halophytes: the influence of potassium, sodium and magnesium in vitro. Plant Soil 146: 153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flowers TJ, Yeo AR (1981) Variability in the resistance of sodium chloride salinity within rice varieties. New Phytol 88: 363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR (1977) The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28: 89–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Flowers TJ, Hagibagheri MA, Clipson NCW (1986) Halophytes. Q Rev Biol 61: 313–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Leach RP, Rogers WJ, Yeo AR (1989) Salt tolerance in the halophyte Suaeda maritima. In: Tazawa M, Katsumi M, Masuda Y, Okamoto H (eds) Plant water relations and growth under stress. Yamada Science Foundation, Osaka, pp 173–180Google Scholar
  26. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Yeo AR (1991) Ion accumulation in the cell walls of rice plants growing under saline conditions: evidence for the Oertli hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ 14: 319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorham J, Hardy CA, Wyn Jones RG, Joppa LR, Law CN (1987) Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 74: 584–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IRRI (1976) Standard evaluation system for rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  29. IRRI (1982) Drought resistance in crop plants with emphasis on rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacoby B (1965) Sodium retention in excised bean stems. Physiol Plant 18: 730–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones HG (1978) Screening for tolerance of photosynthesis to osmotic and saline stress using rice leaf–slices. Photosynthetica 13: 9–14Google Scholar
  32. Jones MP, Wilkins DA (1984) Screening for salinity tolerance by rapid generation advance. Int Rice Res Newsl 9: 9–10Google Scholar
  33. Kuiper PJC (1985) Environmental changes and lipid metabolism of higher plants. Physiol Plant 64: 118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lauchli A (1984) Salt exclusion: an adaptation of legumes for crops and pastures under saline conditions. In: Staples RC, Toenniessen GH (eds) Salinity tolerance in plants; strategies for crop improvement. Wiley, New York, pp 171–187Google Scholar
  35. Leigh RA, Wyn Jones RG (1984) A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell. New Phytol 97: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis OAM, Leidi EO, Lips SH (1989) Effect of nitrogen source on growth response to salinity stress in maize and wheat. New Phytol 111: 155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malan C, Greyling MM, Gressel J (1990) Correlation between CuZn superoxide and glutathione reductase, and environmental and xenobiotic stress tolerance in maize inbreds. Plant Sci 69: 157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malcolm CV (1983) Wheatbelt salinity, a review of the salt land problem of Southwestern Australia. Western Australian Department of Agriculture, PerthGoogle Scholar
  39. Marassi JE, Collado M, Benavidez R, Arturi MJ, Marassi JJN (1989) Performance of selected rice genotypes in alkaline, saline, and normal soils and their interaction with climate factors. Int Rice Res Newsl 14 (6): 10Google Scholar
  40. McCree KJ (1986) Whole-plant carbon balance during osmotic adjustment to drought and salinity stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mengel K, Geurtzen G (1988) Relationship between iron chlorosis and alkalinity in Zea mays. Physiol Plant 72: 460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan JM (1983) Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 34: 607–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morgan JM (1988) The use of coleoptile response to water stress to differentiate wheat genotypes for osmoregulation, growth and yield. Ann Bot 62: 193–198Google Scholar
  44. Munns R (1988) Why measure osmotic adjustment? Aust J Plant Physiol 15: 717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Munns R, Termaat A (1986) Whole-plant responses to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Navari-Izzo F, Izzo R, Bottazzi F, Ranieri A (1988) Effects of water stress and salinity on sterols in Zea mays roots. Phytochemistry 27: 3109–3115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oertli J J (1968) Extracellular salt accumulation, a possible mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochimica 12: 461–469Google Scholar
  48. Passioura JB (1983) Roots and drought resistance. Agric Water Manage 7: 265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Passioura JB (1986) Resistance to drought and salinity: avenues for improvement. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poehlman JM (1987) Breeding field crops. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York Richards RA (1983) Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or non-saline soils? Euphytica 32: 431–438Google Scholar
  51. Rush DW, Epstein E (1981) Breeding and selection for salt tolerance by the incorporation of wild germplasm into a domestic tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 106: 699–704Google Scholar
  52. Sharp RE, Davies WJ (1989) Regulation of growth and development in plants growing with a restricted supply of water. In: Jones HG, Flowers TJ, Jones MB (eds) Plants under stress. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith RCG, Prathapar SA, Barrs HD (1989) Use of a thermal scanner image of a water stressed crop to study soil variability. Remote Sens Environ 29: 111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spitters CJT, Schapendonk AHCM (1990) Evaluation of breeding strategies for drought tolerance in potato by means of crop growth simulation. Plant Soil 123: 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stelzer R (1981) Ion localisation in the leaves of Puccinellia peisonis. Z Pflanzenphysiol 103: 27–36Google Scholar
  56. Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Jana MK, Kumar Rao JVDK (1990) Physiological basis of differences in salinity tolerance of pigeonpea and its related wild species. J Plant Physiol 137: 64–71Google Scholar
  57. Termaat A, Passioura JB, Munns R (1985) Shoot turgor does not limit shoot growth of NaCl-affected wheat and barley. Plant Physiol 77: 869–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner NC, Passioura JB (eds) (1986) Plant growth, drought and salinity. CSIRO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  59. Vasque-Tello Y, Zuily-Fodil Y, Thi ATP, De Silva JBV (1990) Electrolyte and Pi leakages and soluble sugar content as physiological tests for screening resistance to water stress in Phaseolus and Vigna species. J Exp Bot 41: 827–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson D (1984) Identifying and exploiting genetic variation in the physiological components of production. Ann Appl Biol 104: 527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yeo AR (1983) Salinity resistance: physiologies and prices. Physiol Plant 58: 214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1982) Accumulation and localisation of sodium ions within the shoots of rice varieties differing in salinity resistance. Physiol Plant 56: 343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yeo AR, Flowers TJ (1986) Salinity resistance in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) and a pyramiding approach to breeding varieties for saline soils. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 161–173Google Scholar
  64. Yeo AR, Yeo ME, Flowers TJ (1987) The contribution of an apoplastic pathway to sodium uptake by rice roots in saline conditions. J Exp Bot 38: 1141–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yeo AR, Yeo ME, Flowers TJ (1988) Selection of lines with high and low sodium transport from within varieties of an inbreeding species; rice ( Oryza sativa L. ). New Phytol 110: 13–19Google Scholar
  66. Yeo AR, Yeo ME, Flowers SA, Flowers TJ (1990) Screening of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance, and their relationship to overall performance. Theor Appl Genet 79: 377–384Google Scholar
  67. Yeo AR, Lee K-S, Izard P, Boursier PJ, Flowers TJ (1991) Short-and long-term effects of salinity on leaf growth in rice ( Oryza sativa L. ). J Exp Bot 42: 881–889Google Scholar
  68. Yoshida S (1981) Fundamentals of rice crop science. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang J, Davies WJ (1990) Changes in the concentration of ABA in xylem sap as a function of changing soil water status can account for changes in leaf conductance and growth. Plant Cell Environ 13: 227–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Yeo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations