Metacognition: Learning to Learn and Learning to Think
Recent articles on cognitive development, memory, reading and mathematics indicate that much attention is given to metacognition. This paper is intended as an introduction to the operationalisation of metacognition and as an exploration of the relation between metacognition and learning to learn and learning to think skills.
The study assessed the effects of metacognitive skills on students representing different populations. 189 six to twelve year-old students from several schools (elementary schools, schools with students from ethnic minority groups and special schools for slowly learning students) were tested to assess the developmental level of metacognitive skill A quantitative analysis of the results of this study shows that there are differences in metacognitive functioning between the two groups of students. The differences must be interpreted primarily as a difference in planning behaviour. A three-stage process in the development of planning behaviour is observed: Stage 1 — haphazard non planning behaviour. The student is unaware of the end result until after it has been accomplished Stage 2 — inductive stepwise planning behaviour. The student’s approach is a step by step changing of the situation. Stage 3 — deductive planning behaviour. The student does all the planning prior to the execution.
KeywordsPlanning Behaviour Special School Score Level Regular School Metacognitive Skill
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown, A. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Brown, A., & J.C. Campione (1981). Inducing flexible thinking: The problem of access. In M.P. Friedman, J.P. Das & N. O’Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning. New York.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Meta-cognition, motivation, and understanding. LEA, London.Google Scholar
- Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Isaev, E.I. (1985). Psychological description of young children’s planning methods. Soviet Psychology, 1, 35–50.Google Scholar
- Meichenbaum, D., Burland, S., Gruson, L., & Cameron, R. (1985). Metacognitive assessment. In S.R. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children. London: A.P.Google Scholar
- Torgesen, J. (1982). The learning-disabled child as an inactive learner. Educational implications. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 45–53.Google Scholar
- Wolters, MA. (1982). Cognitieve ontwikkeling meetbaar? [Can cognitive development be measured?]. Psychologie en Maatschappij, 1, 75–82.Google Scholar
- Wolters, MA. (1987). Schooling and the development of metacognition. In Proceedings of the Second International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Vol. 1, July 26–29, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, p. 521–529.Google Scholar
- Zak, A.Z. (1983). The development of mental acts in first to tenth graders. Voprosy Psichologii, 1, 43–50 (original text in Russian).Google Scholar