The Use of a Computer Microworld as a Learning Environment to Develop Conceptual Change in the Field of Mechanics

  • F. E. van ’t Hul
  • P. L. Lijnse
  • A. Moes
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

International studies have revealed a clear picture of many conceptual problems students have in understanding physics, caused by existing life-world ideas. Strong examples of such ideas are found in the field of classical mechanics. A “microworld” has been developed based upon a theory of “conceptual change” by trying to arouse a conceptual conflict. In the present case this microworld deals with the principle of inertia in both a real and a frictionless world We have found indications that the possibilities of microcomputers to simulate microworlds provide a useful means of designing instruction that is effective in developing the necessary conceptual change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Di Sessa, A.A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Driver, R. (1984). Cognitive psychology and pupils’ frameworks in mechanics. In P.L. Lijnse (Ed.), The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics, GIREP ‘84 Mechanics, 171–198.Google Scholar
  3. Driver, R. (1988). Changing conceptions. Tijdschrift voor didactiek der J3-wetenschappen, 6, 161–198.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, J.K., & Watts, D.M. (1983). Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in science education, 10, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Härte!, H. (1985). Computer simulation, Physica Didactica, 12, 19.Google Scholar
  6. Hewson, P.W. (1985a). Diagnosis and remediation of an alternative conception of velocity using a microcomputer program. American Journal of Physics, 53, 684–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hewson, P.W. (1985b). Epistemological commitments in learning science: Exam- ples from dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Licht. P. (1987). Concept-verandering in constructivistisch onderwijs: op zoek naar een theoretisch fundament [Conceptual change in constructivistic education: In search of a theoretical foundation]. Tijdschrift didactiek der ßwetenschappen, 5, 105–120.Google Scholar
  9. Lie, S., Sjöberg, S., Ekeland, P.R., & Enge, M. (1985). Ideas in mechanics, a Norwegian Study. In P.L. Lijnse (Ed.), The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics, GIREP ‘84 Mechanics, 255–276.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, G. (1984). Gaines nature plays. Budapest: 00K.Google Scholar
  11. McDermot, L.C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 16, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ogborn, J. (1984). World of Newton (computer program). Harlow, GB: Longman. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Hertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommo- dation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.Google Scholar
  14. Saltiel, E., & Viennot, L. (1984). What do we learn from similarities between historical ideas and the spontaneous reasoning of students? In P.L. Lijnse (Ed.), The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics, GIREP ‘84 Mechanics.Google Scholar
  15. Van Genderen, D. (1983). Kracht en tegenkracht, actie en reactie. Tijdschrift didactiek der natuurwetenschappen, 1, 48–61.Google Scholar
  16. Viennot L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1 (2), 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Watts, D.M., & Zylberstayn, A. (1981). A survey of some ideas about force. Physics Education, 16, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. E. van ’t Hul
    • 1
  • P. L. Lijnse
    • 1
  • A. Moes
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations