Absolute p-Refinement of Two-Dimensional Elasticity Problems in the Vicinity of Boundary Solution Singularities

  • Timothy J. Urekew
  • Joseph J. Rencis
Conference paper

Abstract

A simple polynomial refinement formulation is developed to study the convergence of the collocation boundary element method for two-dimensional elasticity problems, in the vicinity of a boundary solution singularity. The boundary solution singularity considered here is created by discontinuous boundary conditions prescribed at a point on the boundary. A combination of analytic and numeric integrations are used in evaluating the boundary integrals for discontinuous, constant, and continuous, linear through cubic, solution distributions. The L2 boundary error norm, relative percentage error, and solution norm ratio are used to study convergence of displacements and tractions at the crack tip of a plate fracture problem. The reference for convergence is the solution obtained from a fine mesh of quadratic boundary elements.

Keywords

Kelly Timothy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alarcón, E., Reverter, A., and Molina, J. Advances in Finite Element Technology — Hierarchial Boundary Elements, Computers and Structures, Vol. 20, pp. 151–156, 1985.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alarcón, E., and Reverter, A., p-Adaptive Boundary Elements, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 23, pp. 801–829, 1986.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banerjee, P. K., and Butterfield, R., Two-Dimensional Problems of Elastostatics. Chapter 4, Boundary Element Methods in Engineering Science, pp. 177–215, McGraw-Hill, London, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cerrolaza, M. and Alarcón, E., Further Applications of p-Adaptive Boundary Elements, Boundary Elements X, (Ed. Brebbia, C. A.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kardestuncer, H. and Norrie, D. H., Part 2 — Other Finite-Element Methods. Chapter 6, Finite Element Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parreira, P., Self-Adaptive p-Hierarchical Boundary Elements in Elastostatics, Boundary Elements IX, (Eds. Brebbia, C. A., Wendland, W. L., Kuhn, G.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rank, E., Adaptive h-, p-, and hp-Versions for Boundary Integral Element Methods, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 28, pp. 1335–1349, 1989.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reverter, A., Gónzalez, A. and Alarcón, E., Indicators and Estimators in p-Adaptive Boundary Elements, Boundary Elements VII, (Eds. Brebbia, C. A. and Maier, G.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Umetani, S-I., Adaptive Boundary Element Methods in Elastostatics, Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urekew, T. J., and Rencis, J. J., Absolute p-Refinement of Boundary Elements for Two-Dimensional Elasticity Problems, Boundary Elements XI, (Eds. Brebbia, C. A. and Connor, J. J.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zienkiewicz, O. C., Gago, J., and Kelly, D. W., The Hierarchical Concept in Finite Element Analysis, Computers and Structures, Vol. 16, pp. 53–65, 1983.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy J. Urekew
    • 1
  • Joseph J. Rencis
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations