Intracavitary High Dose Rate Afterloading Therapy with Iridium-192: Basic Physical Measurements, Dosimetry, and Localisation
The γ-ray emitting isotopes like radium 226, cobalt 60, iridium 192, and cesium 137 are used with intracavitary afterloading techniques. Though their physical parameters are quite different (Table 1), the isodose distribution does not change very much if therapy-relevant distances of 1–5 cm are respected. The dose decrease around a point source in water for the above-named isotopes, with small deviations, follows the inverse square law and is therefore independent of isotope and photon energy. This results from a nearly complete compensation of absorption by scattering in the vicinity of the source. Depending on the isotope, the correction F(r) for absorption and scattering up to distances of 5 cm ranges between 0% and 8% (Fig. 1) (Dutreix et al. 1982; Young 1983; Meisberger et al. 1968; Meli et al. 1988).
KeywordsSource Position Magnification Factor Middlesex Hospital Intracavitary Irradiation Isodose Distribution
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bates TD, Berry RJ (1980) High-dose-rate afterloading in the treatment of cancer of the uterus. Br J Radiol [Special Rep] 17Google Scholar
- Dale RG (1980) Dosimetry of the Charing Cross Cathetron. Br J Radiol [Special Rep] 17: 38–42Google Scholar
- Dutreix A, Marinello G, Wambersie A (1982) Dosimétrie en curiethérapie. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Himmelmann A, Ragnhult I (1983) High dose-rate after-loading treatment in carcinoma of the uterine cervix using an individual planning and reconstruction system. Acta Radiol [Oncol] (Stockh) 22: 263–271Google Scholar
- Himmelmann A, Karlstedt K, Ragnhult I (1980) Early experience with high dose-rate (Ralstron) treatment in Göteborg. Br J Radiol [Special Rep] 17: 106–110Google Scholar
- International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) (1985) Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gyneology. ICRU, Bethesda (Report no 38 )Google Scholar
- Meli JA, Meigooni AS, Nath R (1988) On the choice of phantom material for dosimetry of Ir–192 sources. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14–587–594Google Scholar
- Planskoy B, Lim A (1980) Cathetron dosimetry at the Middlesex Hospital, London. Br J. Radiol [Special Rep] 17: 45–49Google Scholar
- Snelling MD, Lambert HE, Yarnold L (1980) Clinical results and complications following treatment of carcinoma of the cervix and endometrium using Cathetron at Middlesex Hospital. Br J Radiol [Special Rep] 17: 33–37Google Scholar
- Ward AJ, Stubbs B, Dixon B, Firth LA (1980) A shedule of radiotherapy, including the use of the Cathetron for advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol [Special Rep] 17: 17–23Google Scholar
- Young ME (1983) Radiological physics, 3rd edn. Lewis LondonGoogle Scholar