Advertisement

New Theoretical Aspects in DIET

  • J. W. Gadzuk
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Surface Sciences book series (SSSUR, volume 19)

Abstract

A number of stimulated desorption issues that have been addressed in terms of wave packet propagation over image-potential augmented, intermediate state potential curves will be discussed. Specifically, giant enhancements in ESD yields of 0(a)/Pd(111) and laser-induced desorption for N0/Pt(lll) will be considered.

Keywords

Wave Packet Potential Energy Curve Shape Resonance Kinetic Energy Distribution Incident Electron Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. (a)
    Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by N.H. Tolk, M.M. Traum, J.C. Tully, and T.E. Madey (Springer, Berlin, 1983).Google Scholar
  2. 1. (b)
    Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by W. Brenig and D. Menzel (Springer, Berlin, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 1. (c)
    Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by R.H. Stulen and M.L. Knotek (Springer, Berlin, 1988).Google Scholar
  4. 2. (a)
    M.L. Knotek, Rep, Prog. Phys. 47, 1499 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 2. (b)
    J.W. Gadzuk, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 395 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 2. (c)
    P. Avouris and R.E. Walkup, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 173 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 3.
    E.J. Heller, J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544 (1975): Acc. Chem. Res. 14, 368 (1981); in Potential Energy Surfaces and Dynamics Calculations, edited by D.G. Truhlar (Plenum, New York, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4. (a)
    R. Kosloff, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 2087 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 4. (b)
    S. Sawada. R. Heather, B. Jackson, and H. Metiu, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 3009 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4. (c)
    R.D. Coalson and J.L. Kinsey, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 4322 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 4. (d)
    V. Mohan and N. Sathyamurthy, Comp. Phys. Rep. 7, 213 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 4.(e)
    D.J. Tannor and S.A. Rice, Adv. Chem. Phys. 70, 441 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 5. (a)
    Three examples which emphasize the most common possibilities are: Bonding-to-antibonding-orbital transition of valence electrons, usually synonymous with the Menzel, Gomer, Redhead model: D. Menzel and R. Gomer, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3311 (1964); P.E. Redhead, Can. J. Phys. 42., 886 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 5. (b)
    Three examples which emphasize the most common possibilities are: Core-hole-initiated Auger processes: P.J. Feibelman and M.L. Knotek, Phys. Rev. B 18, 6531 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 5. (c)
    Three examples which emphasize the most common possibilities are: Neutralization of electronegative adsorbates, thus switching off the image potential attraction: Ph. Avouris, R. Kawai, N.D. Lang, and D.M. Newns, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 2388 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 6. (a)
    Examples based on time-dependent wave packet propagation, the method of choice in this paper, include: W. Brenig, Z. Phys. B 23, 361 (1976); J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 51, 1914 (1982); Ref. 1 (a) Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by N.H. Tolk, M.M. Traum, J.C. Tully, and T.E. Madey (Springer, Berlin, 1983). p.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 6. (b)
    Examples based on time-dependent wave packet propagation, the method of choice in this paper, include: E.B. Stechel, Ref. 1 (b) Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by W. Brenig and D. Menzel (Springer, Berlin, 1985)., p.32; E.B. Stechel, D.R. Jennison, and A.R. Burns, Ref. 1 (c) Excellent introductions to both the historical background and state-of-the-art of the field are given in the proceedings of the DIET workshops., edited by R.H. Stulen and M.L. Knotek (Springer, Berlin, 1988)., p.136.Google Scholar
  18. 6. (c)
    Examples based on time-dependent wave packet propagation, the method of choice in this paper, include: J.W. Gadzuk and C.W. Clark, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 3174 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 7.
    J.W. Gadzuk, Comm. At. Mol. Phys. 16, 219 (1985); R. Brako and D.M. Newns, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52, 655 (1989).Google Scholar
  20. 8.
    P.R. Antoniewicz, Phys. Rev. B 21, 3811 (1980).Google Scholar
  21. 9.
    P.J. Jennings and R.O. Jones, Adv. in Phys. 37, 341 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 10. (a)
    Z.W. Gortel, H.J. Kreuzer, P. Feulner, and D. Menzel, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8951 (1987-I)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 10. (b)
    Z.W. Gortel, R. Teshima, and H.J. Kreuzer, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3183 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 11.
    W. Hübner and W. Brenig, Z. Phys. B 74, 361 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 12.
    J.W. Gadzuk, L.J. Richter, S.A. Buntin, R.R. Cavanagh, and D.S. King, (to be published).Google Scholar
  26. 13.
    A. Hoffman, X. Guo, J.T. Yates, Jr., J.W. Gadzuk, and C.W. Clark, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5793 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 14.
    S.A. Buntin, L.J. Richter, R.R. Cavanagh, and D.S. King, Phys. Rev. Letters 61, 1321 (1988); D.S. King and R.R. Cavanagh, Adv. Chem. Phys. 76, 45 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 15.
    P. Feulner, D. Menzel, H.J. Kreuzer, and Z.W. Gortel, Phys. Rev. Letters 53, 671 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 16.
    E.J. Heller, R.L. Sundberg, and D. Tannor, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 1822 (1982); S.O. Williams and D.G. Imre, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 3363 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 17.
    T.J. Chuang, Surface Sci. Repts. 3, 1 (1983); W. Ho, Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 13, 293 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 18.
    V. Dose, Surface Science Repts. 5, 337 (1985); P.D. Johnson and S.L. Hulbert, Phys. Rev. B 35, 9427 (1987-II); B. Gumhalter, K. Wandelt, and Ph. Avouris, Phys. Rev. B 37, 8048 (1988-I).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 19.
    J.W. Gadzuk, U. Landman, E.J. Kuster, C.L. Cleveland, and R.N. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Letters 49, 426 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 20.
    A.R. Burns, E.B. Stechel, and D.R. Jennison, Phys. Rev. Letters 58, 250 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Gadzuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Atomic, Molecular, and Optical PhysicsNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyGaithersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations