A Method of Scaling for Ship-Ice Model Tests

  • D. B. Colbourne
  • J. H. Lever
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Abstract

A dimensional analysis of the problem of vessels transiting level continuous ice is presented. Resistance is divided into components and each analyzed to identify dimensionless terms relevant to the individual component. These expressions provide a framework for scaling ship-ice model test results. A workable subset of scaling requirements for a three component division of the problem is derived from the general case. Some experimental results are presented demonstrating the utility of the method. It is shown that it may be possible to compensate for poor scaling in ice properties by scaling each component based on its own law of similitude.

Keywords

Resis Hull 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkins, A.G., Caddell, R.M. 1974. The laws of similitude and crack propagation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Colbourne, D.B. 1989. A three component method of scaling ice resistance. Ph.D. Thesis, Memorial University of Newfoundland.Google Scholar
  3. Comstock, J.P. 1967. Principles of naval architecture. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, R.Y. et al. 1972. Full scale and model tests of a Great Lakes icebreaker. Transactions of The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 80, pp. 170–207.Google Scholar
  5. Enkvist, E. 1972. On the ice resistance encountered by ships operating in the continuous mode of icebreaking. The Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences in Finland, Helsinki, Report No. 24.Google Scholar
  6. Enkvist, E. 1983. A survey of experimental indications of the relation between the submersion and breaking components of level ice resistance to ships. POAC, Helsinki, Vol. 1, pp. 484–493.Google Scholar
  7. Forland, K.A., Tatinclaux, J.C. 1985. Experimental investigation of the kinetic friction coefficient of ice. CRREL Report No. 85 - 6, Hanover, N.H.Google Scholar
  8. Kashteljan, V.I., Poznjak, I.I., Ryvlin, A.J. 1968. Ice resistance to motion of a ship. Translation, Marine Computer Applications Corp.Google Scholar
  9. Sharp, J.J. 1981. Hydraulic Modelling. Butterworths, Toronto.Google Scholar
  10. Timco, G.W. 1984. Ice forces on structures: physical modelling techniques. IAHR Symposium on Ice, Hamburg, Vol. 4, pp. 117–150.Google Scholar
  11. Vance, G.P. 1974. A modelling system for vessels in ice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. B. Colbourne
    • 1
  • J. H. Lever
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Marine DynamicsNational Research Council CanadaSt. John’sCanada
  2. 2.U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations