Skip to main content

Impact Ice Pressure: More Questions than Answers

  • Conference paper
Ice-Structure Interaction

Abstract

Impact interaction between ice and engineering structures is always accompanied by ice failure. The failure modes can include crushing, cracking, bending, spalling, etc. Which mode is predominant depends mainly on the geometry of the colliding bodies, while the ice-induced impact loads depend both on the ice failure mode, and on the impact conditions. The earlier authors (Runeberg, 1888; Makarov, 1901) hypothesized that the ice-induced loads cannot exceed the strength of ice under corresponding types of loading. This presumption, which is now called the limiting ice strength approach, has been widely used as the basic criterion in specifying the design ice loads due to static (or quasi-static) and dynamic interactions. Here, the term “static” implies that the ice-structure interaction is not affected by the inertial forces of the interacting bodies. The “dynamic” or “impact” interaction has been thought of as the interaction which is either governed mainly by the inertial forces or when the latter may not be ignored. The wind-driven ice fields advancing on an offshore structure, a ship continuously progressing in consolidated ice, both can be treated as static or quasi-static interactions regardless of the advancement rate and the cyclicity of the induced load. A collision of a ship with an ice floe, or a wave-driven bergy bit hitting an offshore structure are the typical “impact” (dynamic) scenarios addressed in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • APOA (Arctic Petroleum Operators Association) 1982. Ice forces on Hans Island. APOA Project No. 181, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • APOA (Arctic Petroleum Operators Association) 1984. Tarsiut Island data analysis. APOA Project No.213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, S.N., Williams, F.M. 1989. Measurement of impact force on sea ice. Proc. POAC ’89, Lulea, Sweden, June 12–15, Vol. 2, pp. 638–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley, C.G., St. John., J.W., Seibold, F., Bayly, I. 1984. Analysis of extreme ice loads measured on USCGC Polar Sea. Trans. SNAME, Vol. 92, pp. 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dementyev, Kh.N. 1961. Determining the impact hardness of ice. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 7, pp. 52–53, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tahan, H., Swamidas, A.S.J., Arockiasamy, M., Reddy, D.V. 1984. Strength of iceberg and artificial snow ice under high strain rates and impact loads. Proc. OMAE ’84, New Orleans, LA, Vol. 3, pp. 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, L., Sandkvist, J. 1989. Pendulum indentation tests on manufactured ice. Proc. POAC ’89, Lulea, Sweden, Vol. 2, pp. 669–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, N.B., Farrel, D., Mellor, M. 1985. Ice penetration tests. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 11, pp. 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghomeim, G.A.M., Keinonen, A.J. 1983. Full-scale impact tests of Canmar Kigoriak in thick ice. Proc. POAC ’83, Helsinki, Finland, Vol. 3, pp. 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glen, I.F., Comfort, G. 1983. Ice impact pressure and load: investigation by laboratory experiments and sea trials. Proc. POAC ’83, Helsinki, Finland, Vol. 1, pp. 516–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glen, I.F., Blount, H. 1984. Measurement of ice impact pressures and loads onboard CCGS Louis S. S.. Laurent. Proc. OMAE ’84, New Orleans, LA, Vol. 3, pp. 246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glen, I.F., Nawwar, A.M., Brown, R. 1985. MV Arctic structural performance. Summary report TP 5681E ( Available from Transportation Development Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. 1985. Impact forces and friction coefficient on the forebody of the German polar research vessel Polarstern. Proc. POAC ’85, Narssarssuaq, Greenland, Sept. Vol. 3, pp. 1189–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu, A. 1988. Ice pressure measurements using PVDF Film. Proc. OMAE ’88, Houston, Texas, Vol. 4, pp. 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.C., Benoit, J.R. 1987. Iceberg impact strength. Proc. OTC ’87, Houston, TX, Paper OTC-5599, Vol. 4, pp. 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordaan, I.J., McKenna, R.F. 1988. Modelling of progressive damage in ice. Proc. IAHR Ice Symposium 1988, Sapporo, Japan, Vol. 2, pp. 585–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheisin, D.E., Cherepanov, N.V. 1970. Changing the structure of ice in the zone of a rigid body impact against ice cover surface. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 34, pp. 79–84, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheisin, D.E., Likhomanov, V.A. 1973. Experimental determination of specific energy of mechanical crushing of ice due to impact. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 41, pp. 55–61, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kheisin, D.E., Kurdyumov, V.A., Likhomanov, V.A. 1975. Determining the specific crushing energy and contact pressures due to rigid body-ice impact. Trans. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Leningrad, Vol. 326, pp. 210–218, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khrapaty, N.G., Tsuprick, V.G. 1976. Experimental study of rigid body-ice impact. Proc. Coordination Meeting on Hydraulic Engineering, Leningrad, Energia Publishing House, issue 111, pp. 166–169, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaa, S., Kujala, P. 1988. Measuring ice loads onboard the MV Kashira. Proc. Soviet-Finnish Seminar on Ice Strength of Ships, Leningrad in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdyumov, V.A., Kheisin, D.E. 1976. A hydrodynamic model of ice-rigid body impact. Applied Mechanics, XII, 10, 1976, pp. 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likhomanov, V.A., Kheisin, D.E. 1971. Experimental study of rigid body-ice impact. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic, 38, pp. 105–111, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makarov, S.O. 1901. The Ermak in ice. St. Petersburg, 670 p, in Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnick, P., St. John, J., Cowper, B., Edgecombe, M. 1986. The 1985 global ice impact tests on the USCGC Polar Sea. Report No. SR–1313 for Ship Structure Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, L., Payer, H.G. 1988. Loads on research vessel Polarstern under arctic conditions, Proc. POAC ’87, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, Vol.1, pp. 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, L., Payer, H.G., Moore, C. 1989. Ice impact of ship hulls. Working Group on Ice Forces, 4th State-of-the-Art Report, Special Report 89-5, CRREL, Hanover, New Hampshire, pp. 339–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevel, D.E. 1986. Iceberg impact forces. Proc. IAHR Ice Symposium 1986, Iowa City, IA, USA, Vol.3, pp. 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounder, E.R., Little, E.M. 1959. Some physical properties of sea ice. Canadian J. of Physics, Vol. 37, pp. 345–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riska, K., Kujala, P., Vuorio, J. 1983. Ice load and pressure measurements onboard IB Sisu. Proc. POAC ’83, Helsinki, Finland, April 1983, Vol.2, pp.1055–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runeberg, R. 1888. On steamers for winter navigation and ice-breaking. Proc. Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 97, Pt. Ill, pp. 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryvlin, A.Ya., Kheisin, D.E. 1980. Tests of ships in ice. Leningrad, Sudostroenie Publishing House, 208 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, J.W., Daley, C. 1984. Shipboard measurements of ice pressures in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas. Proc. OMAE ’84, New Orleans, LA, Vol.3, pp.260–266. (see also St. John, Daley, Blount - Ice Loads and Ship Response to Ice. Final Report No. SR-1291, Dec. 1984, by Arctec Group Companies prepared for SSC and Transport Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, D.S. and Morris, C.E. 1986. Impact ice force and pressure: An experimental study with urea ice. Proc. OMAE ’86, Tokyo, Japan, Vol. 4, pp. 569–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swearengen, J.C. 1988. Deformation and fracture of arctic sea ice during kinetic energy penetration Proc. OMAE ’88, Houston, Texas, Vol. 4, pp. 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsurikow, V.L., Veselova, L.E. 1973. Dynamic hardness of the Caspian Sea ice. Trans. “Studies of Ice of the USSR Southern Seas”, Moscow, Nauka Publishing House, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunik, A.L. 1984 Dynamic ice loads on a ship. Proc. IAHR Ice Symposium 1984, Hamburg, W. Germany, Vol. 3, pp. 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunik, A.L. 1989. Impact crushing strength of ice. Proc. POAC ’89, Lulea, Sweden, 1989, Vol. 2, pp. 685–670.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tunik, A.L. (1991). Impact Ice Pressure: More Questions than Answers. In: Jones, S., Tillotson, J., McKenna, R.F., Jordaan, I.J. (eds) Ice-Structure Interaction. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84100-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84100-2_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84102-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84100-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics