Adélie and Chinstrap Penguins: Their Potential as Monitors of the Southern Ocean Marine Ecosystem

  • W. Z. Trivelpiece
  • S. G. Trivelpiece
  • G. R. Geupel
  • J. Kjelmyr
  • N. J. Volkman


Analysis of annual variability in the parameters recommended by CCAMLR for ecosystem monitoring revealed considerable variation among the parameters for which we have sufficient data to make an assessment. Interpretation of the observed variability was greatly enhanced when several parameters were considered simultaneously. In concert, the parameters should be useful for assessing perturbations in the Antarctic ecosystem. The choice of Adélie and chinstrap penguins as key indicator species seems an excellent one, given their very different responses to the highly variable conditions in the Antarctic Peninsula region, their species-specific breeding patterns, and the asynchrony between their respective breeding seasons. If a time series of data becomes available, it may be possible to differentiate between fishery-induced and natural perturbations in the ecosystem.


Breeding Success South Shetland Island Chinstrap Penguin Overwinter Survival Antarctic Peninsula Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainley DG, LeResche RE, Sladen WJL (1983) Breeding biology of the Adélie penguin. University of California Press, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  2. CCAMLR (1985) Report of the fourth meeting of the Scientific Committee, Annex 7. Rep Ad hoc Working Group on Ecosystem Monitoring. SC-CAMLR-IV, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. CCAMLR (1988) Standard methods for monitoring parameters for species. CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program, Hobart, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. Croxall JP, Prince PA (1979) Antarctic seabird and seal monitoring studies. Polar Rec 19:573–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Everson I (1977) The living resources of the Southern Ocean. FAO GLO/SO/77/a, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Jablonski B (1984) Distribution and numbers of penguins in the region of King George Island, South Shetland Islands in the breeding season 1980/81. Pol Pol Res 5:17–30Google Scholar
  7. Jablonski B (1985) The diet of penguins on King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Acta Zool Cracov 29:117–186Google Scholar
  8. Prevost J (1981) Population, biomass and energy requirements of Antarctic birds. In: El-Sayed SZ (ed) Biomass, vol II. Scott Pol Res Inst, Cambridge, p 125Google Scholar
  9. SCAR (1979) Fifteenth meeting of SCAR, Chamonix, 16–26 May 1978 Appendix A. Working Group in Biology. Polar Rec 19:304–312Google Scholar
  10. Sladen WJL (1958) The pygoscelid penguins. I. Methods of study. II. The Adélie penguin (P. adeliae). Sci Rep Falkld Is Depend Surv 17:1–97Google Scholar
  11. Trivelpiece WZ, Volkman NJ (1979) Nest site competition between Adélie and Chinstrap penguins: an ecological interpretation. Auk 96:675–681Google Scholar
  12. Volkman NJ, Presler P, Trivelpiece WZ (1980) Diets of pygoscelid penguins at King George Island, Antarctica. Condor 82:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilson RP (1984) An improved stomach pump for penguins and other seabirds. J Field Ornithol 55:109–112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Z. Trivelpiece
  • S. G. Trivelpiece
  • G. R. Geupel
  • J. Kjelmyr
  • N. J. Volkman
    • 1
  1. 1.Point Reyes Bird ObservatoryUSA

Personalised recommendations