Abstract
Although still grossly underutilized in many parts of the world, mammography screening is being done with increasing frequency. Also gaining in popularity is the concept of high volume, streamlined screening at low cost (Lundgren and Jakobsson 1976a; Moskowitz and Fox 1979; Lundgren and Helleberg 1982; Tabar et al. 1983; Strax 1984; McLelland 1984; Sickles et al. 1986b; Bird and McLelland 1986; McLelland 1987; American Cancer Society 1987; Sickles 1987; Monsees et al. 1988; Sickles 1988). Among the various methods suggested to reduce costs is the practice of irtiaging each breast with one rather than two standard projections (Lundgren and Jakobsson 1976a; Lundgren and Helleberg, Tabar et al. 1983). This approach certainly will halve the cost of X-ray film, but more importantly, it may also permit increased patient throughput and reduced interpretation time. In addition, despite the negligible difference in oncogenic risk (Feig 1984; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements 1986), mammography at half the radiation dose might further increase patient compliance (Buchanan and Jager 1977; Bassett et al. 1986).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Cancer Society (1987) Proceedings of the workshop on strategies to lower the cost of screening mammography. Cancer 60: 1669–1702
Andersson I (1981) Radiographic screening for breast carcinoma. III. Appearance of carcinoma and number of projections to be used at screening. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh) 22: 407–420
Andersson I, Mühlow A, Pettersson H (1978) Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. AJR 130: 349–351
Bassett LW, Pagani J J, Gold RH (1980) Pitfalls in mammography. Demonstrating deep lesions. Radiology 136: 641–645
Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Cerny J A, Gold RH (1986) Screening mammography: referral practices of Los Angeles physicians. AJR 147: 689–692
Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Jahanshahi R, Gold RH, Arndt RD, Linsman J (1987) Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. Radiology 165: 95–97
Bird RE, McLelland R (1986) How to initiate and operate a low-cost screening mammography center. Radiology 161: 43–47
Buchanan JB, Jager RM (1977) Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening. Radiology 123: 63–68
Feig SA (1984) Radiation risk from mammography: is it clinically significant? AJR 143: 469–475
Ikeda DM, Sickles EA (1988) Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast. Radiology 168: 651–656
Libshitz HI, Fetouh S, Isley J, Lester RG (1976) One-view mammographic screening. Radiology 120: 719–722
Lundgren B (1977) The oblique view at mammography. Br J Radiol 50: 626–628
Lundgren B, Jakobsson S (1976a) Single view mammography. A simple and efficient approach to breast cancer screening. Cancer 38: 1124–1129
Lundgren B, Jakobsson S (1976b) Screening for carcinoma of the breast with single-view mammography. Medicamundi 21: 27–33
Lundgren B, Helleberg A (1982) Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 68: 351–355
McLelland R (1984) Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology. AJR 143: l–A
McLelland R (1987) Low-cost mass screening with mammography as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 25: 1007–1013
Monsees BM, Destouet JM, Evens RG (1988) The self-referred patient: a new responsibility for radiologists. Radiology 166: 69–70
Moskowitz M, Libshitz HI (1977) Mammographic screening for breast cancer by lateral view only: is it practical? J Can Assoc Radiol 28: 259–261
Moskowitz M, Fox SH (1979) Cost analysis of aggressive breast cancer screening. Radiology 130: 253–256
Muir BB, Kirkpatrick AE, Roberts MM, Duffy SW (1984) Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress. Radiology 151: 39–41
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1986) Mammography—A user’s guide. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, pp 95–121
Pagani JJ, Bassett LW, Gold RH et al. (1980) Efficacy of combined film-screen/xeromammography: preliminary report. AJR 135: 141–146
Sickles EA (1987) Reduced-price mammography screening. Commentary. AJR 149: 1153–1154
Sickles EA (1988) Impact of low-cost mammography screening on nearby mammography practices. Radiology 168: 59–61
Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA (1986a) Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR 147: 1149–1153
Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA (1986b) Mammography screening: how to operate successfully at low cost. Radiology 160: 95–97
Strax P (1984) Mass screening for control of breast cancer. Cancer 53: 665–670
Tabar L, Gad A (1981) Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial. Radiology 138: 219–222
Tabar L, Gad A, Akerlund E, Holmberg L (1983) Screening for breast cancer in Sweden. In: Feig SA, McLelland R (eds) Breast carcinoma, current diagnosis and treatment. Masson, New York, pp 315–326
Tabar L, Akerlund E, Gad A (1984) Five-year experience with single-view mammography randomized controlled screening in Sweden. In: Brunner S, Langfeldt B, Andersen PE (eds) Early detection of breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 105–113
Thomas BA, Price JL, Boulter PS, Gibbs NM (1984) The first three years of the Guildford Breast Screening Project. In: Brunner S, Langfeldt B, Andersen PE (eds) Early detection of breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–199
van der Maas PJ et al. (1988) The costs and effects of mass screening for breast cancer. Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sickles, E.A. (1990). One Versus Two Views per Breast for Screening Mammography. In: Brünner, S., Langfeldt, B. (eds) Advances in Breast Cancer Detection. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84065-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84065-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84067-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84065-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive