Skip to main content

One Versus Two Views per Breast for Screening Mammography

  • Conference paper
Advances in Breast Cancer Detection

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 119))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Although still grossly underutilized in many parts of the world, mammography screening is being done with increasing frequency. Also gaining in popularity is the concept of high volume, streamlined screening at low cost (Lundgren and Jakobsson 1976a; Moskowitz and Fox 1979; Lundgren and Helleberg 1982; Tabar et al. 1983; Strax 1984; McLelland 1984; Sickles et al. 1986b; Bird and McLelland 1986; McLelland 1987; American Cancer Society 1987; Sickles 1987; Monsees et al. 1988; Sickles 1988). Among the various methods suggested to reduce costs is the practice of irtiaging each breast with one rather than two standard projections (Lundgren and Jakobsson 1976a; Lundgren and Helleberg, Tabar et al. 1983). This approach certainly will halve the cost of X-ray film, but more importantly, it may also permit increased patient throughput and reduced interpretation time. In addition, despite the negligible difference in oncogenic risk (Feig 1984; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements 1986), mammography at half the radiation dose might further increase patient compliance (Buchanan and Jager 1977; Bassett et al. 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Cancer Society (1987) Proceedings of the workshop on strategies to lower the cost of screening mammography. Cancer 60: 1669–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson I (1981) Radiographic screening for breast carcinoma. III. Appearance of carcinoma and number of projections to be used at screening. Acta Radiol [Diagn] (Stockh) 22: 407–420

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson I, Mühlow A, Pettersson H (1978) Number of projections in mammography: influence on detection of breast disease. AJR 130: 349–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett LW, Pagani J J, Gold RH (1980) Pitfalls in mammography. Demonstrating deep lesions. Radiology 136: 641–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Cerny J A, Gold RH (1986) Screening mammography: referral practices of Los Angeles physicians. AJR 147: 689–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Jahanshahi R, Gold RH, Arndt RD, Linsman J (1987) Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. Radiology 165: 95–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bird RE, McLelland R (1986) How to initiate and operate a low-cost screening mammography center. Radiology 161: 43–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JB, Jager RM (1977) Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening. Radiology 123: 63–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feig SA (1984) Radiation risk from mammography: is it clinically significant? AJR 143: 469–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda DM, Sickles EA (1988) Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast. Radiology 168: 651–656

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Libshitz HI, Fetouh S, Isley J, Lester RG (1976) One-view mammographic screening. Radiology 120: 719–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren B (1977) The oblique view at mammography. Br J Radiol 50: 626–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren B, Jakobsson S (1976a) Single view mammography. A simple and efficient approach to breast cancer screening. Cancer 38: 1124–1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren B, Jakobsson S (1976b) Screening for carcinoma of the breast with single-view mammography. Medicamundi 21: 27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren B, Helleberg A (1982) Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 68: 351–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLelland R (1984) Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology. AJR 143: l–A

    Google Scholar 

  • McLelland R (1987) Low-cost mass screening with mammography as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 25: 1007–1013

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monsees BM, Destouet JM, Evens RG (1988) The self-referred patient: a new responsibility for radiologists. Radiology 166: 69–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz M, Libshitz HI (1977) Mammographic screening for breast cancer by lateral view only: is it practical? J Can Assoc Radiol 28: 259–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz M, Fox SH (1979) Cost analysis of aggressive breast cancer screening. Radiology 130: 253–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muir BB, Kirkpatrick AE, Roberts MM, Duffy SW (1984) Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress. Radiology 151: 39–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1986) Mammography—A user’s guide. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, pp 95–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani JJ, Bassett LW, Gold RH et al. (1980) Efficacy of combined film-screen/xeromammography: preliminary report. AJR 135: 141–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1987) Reduced-price mammography screening. Commentary. AJR 149: 1153–1154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA (1988) Impact of low-cost mammography screening on nearby mammography practices. Radiology 168: 59–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA (1986a) Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR 147: 1149–1153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA (1986b) Mammography screening: how to operate successfully at low cost. Radiology 160: 95–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strax P (1984) Mass screening for control of breast cancer. Cancer 53: 665–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Gad A (1981) Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial. Radiology 138: 219–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Gad A, Akerlund E, Holmberg L (1983) Screening for breast cancer in Sweden. In: Feig SA, McLelland R (eds) Breast carcinoma, current diagnosis and treatment. Masson, New York, pp 315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Akerlund E, Gad A (1984) Five-year experience with single-view mammography randomized controlled screening in Sweden. In: Brunner S, Langfeldt B, Andersen PE (eds) Early detection of breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BA, Price JL, Boulter PS, Gibbs NM (1984) The first three years of the Guildford Breast Screening Project. In: Brunner S, Langfeldt B, Andersen PE (eds) Early detection of breast cancer. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–199

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maas PJ et al. (1988) The costs and effects of mass screening for breast cancer. Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sickles, E.A. (1990). One Versus Two Views per Breast for Screening Mammography. In: Brünner, S., Langfeldt, B. (eds) Advances in Breast Cancer Detection. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84065-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84065-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84067-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84065-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics