Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology ((PSYCHOLOGY))

Abstract

A net of ten psychological utility theories is described in the frame of the structuralist metatheory. The basic and simplest theory element is a “general theory of utility maximizing” which seems to be the core of a whole cluster of psychological theories dealing with learning, attitudes, and achievement motivation. One of the results of the reconstruction is the insight that — contrary to a widespread intuition — theories of achievement motivation cannot be conceived of as specializations of the theory of subjective expected utility. Other results concern the divergence between the theories to be tested and the theories actually being tested, the testability of achievement motivation theories, the “holism” of psychological utility theories, and the nature of the intertheoretical relationships in the social sciences in contrast to those in the natural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque. Critique des postulats et axioms de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. (1975). Einführung in die Motivationsforschung. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W. (1982). Old and new conceptions of how expected consequences influence actions. In Feather (1982, pp. 17–52).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J.W., & D. Birch (1970). A dynamic theory of action. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W. (1985a). On a new definition of theoreticity. Dialectica,39, 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., & J. Sneed (1977). Generalized net structures of empirical theories. Part I. Studia Logica, 36, 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., & J. Sneed (1978). Generalized net structures of empirical theories. Part II. Studia Logica, 37, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., C.-U. Moulines & J. Sneed (1987). An architectonic for science. The structuralist program. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich, W. (1981). Strukturalistische Rekonstruktionen. Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung, Weiterentwicklung und interdisziplinären Anwendung des strukturalistischen Konzepts wissenschaftlicher Theorien. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N.T. (Ed.) (1982). Expectations and actions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationship between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadenne, V. (1984). Theorie und Erfahrung in der psychologischen Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadenne, V. (1985). Theoretische Begriffe und die Prüfbarkeit von Theorien. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, 16, 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1981). Messung und Modellbildung in der Psychologic Mü: Reinhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W.L. (1973). Statistics for the social sciences. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1963). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation. Meisenheim: Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1980). Motivation und Handeln: Lehrbuch der Motivationspsychologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, T. (1976). Die Psychologie und ihre Forschungsprogramme. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L. (1975). A nonsimple conjoint measurement model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 437–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hucklenbroich, P. (1982). Epistemological reflections on the structuralist philosophy of science. Metamedicine, 3, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.McV. (Ed.) (1944). Personality and the behavior disorders. Vol. I. New York: Roland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & A. Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H., & A. Tversky (1971). Conjoint measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology. Psychological Review, 78, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H., R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, & A. Tversky (1971). Foundations of measurement. Vol. I: Additive and polynomial representations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, J. (1978). Situations-, reaktions- und personenbezogene Konsistenz des Leistungsmotivs bei der Messung mittels des Heckhausen TAT. Archiv für Psychologie, 130, 37–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1974). FalsifiKation und die Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme. In Lakatos & Musgrave (1974, pp. 89–190).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., & A. Musgrave (Eds.) (1974). Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., T. Dembo, L. Festinger, & P.S. Sears (1944). Level of aspiration. In Hunt (1944, pp. 333–378).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J.G., & J.L. Cohen (1978). The use of subjective expected utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1138–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D., J.W. Atkinson, R. Clark, & E. Lowell (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.A. (1943). Thematic apperception test manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, B. (1974). Einführung in die Theorie des Messens. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1974). Die Normalwissenschaft und ihre Gefahren. In Lakatos & Musgrave (1974, pp. 51–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1984). Logik der Forschung. (Achte Auflage). Tübingen: Mohr. (Erstausgabe 1935, Wien: Springer.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1931). The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F.S. (1979). Measurement theory with applications to decisionmaking, utiliy, and the social sciences. Reading (Mass.): Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J. (1960). An analysis of affective-cognitive consistency. In Rosenberg et al. (1960, pp. 15–64).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J., & R.P. Abelson (1960). An analysis of cognitive balancing. In Rosenberg et al. (1960, pp. 112–163).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M.J., C.I. Hovland, W.J. McGuire, R.P. Abelson, & J.W. Brehm (Eds.) (1960). Attitude organization and change. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J.N. (1973). Brand profiles from beliefs and importances. Journal of Advertising Research, 13, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. (1971). The logical structure of mathematical physics. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, J. (1979). The logical structure of mathematical physics. (Second Edition, Revised). Dordrecht: Reidel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1969). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band I: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1970). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1973). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band II, 2. Halbband: Theorienstrukturen und Theoriendynamik. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1973a). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band IV: Personelle und statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1979). The structuralist view of theories. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1980). Neue Wege der Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1986a). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Teil F: Neuer intuitiver Zugang zum strukturalistischen Theorienkonzept, Theorie-Elemente, Theoriennetze, Theorienevolutionen. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1986b). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Teil G: Strukturspezies, T- Theoretizität, Approximation, verallgemeinerte intertheoretische Relationen, Inkommensurabilität. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1986c). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophic Band II: Theorie und Erfahrung. Teil H: Realismus und Strukturalismus, Anwendungen: Tauschwirtschaft, Entscheidungstheorie, Neurosenlehre, Kapital- und Mehrwerttheorie Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, E. (1989). Zur logischen Struktur psychologischer Theorien. Eine Untersuchung im Rahmen der strukturalistischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1967). Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 27–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. (1967a). Additivity, utility, and subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & D. Kahneman (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbik, H. (1978). Handlungstheorien. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermann, R. (1987). Strukturalistische Theorienkonzeption und empirische Forschung in der Psychologic Eine Fallstudie Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westmeyer, H. (1977). Psychologie und Wissenschaftstheorie: Einige Überlegungen aus analytischer Sicht. In K.A. Schneewind (Hg.) (1977). Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen der Psychologic München: Reinhardt, pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiswede, G. (1988). Umrisse einer integrativen Lerntheorie sozialen Verhaltens. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 19, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stephan, E. (1989). A Net of Psychological Utility Theories. In: Westmeyer, H. (eds) Psychological Theories from a Structuralist Point of View. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84015-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84015-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51904-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84015-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics