Advertisement

A Reconstruction of Sigmund Freud’s Early Theory of the Unconscious

  • W. Balzer
  • P. Marcou
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

A version of Freud’s early theory of the unconscious — which is a completely qualitative theory — is reconstructed in precise terms. The important structuralist components: models, potential models, partial potential models, constraints, links, measuring models, intended applications are identified, and an explanation for neurosis is given. The theory’s empirical claim and confirmation are considered. The particular position of therapeutically relevant theories is discussed and clarified. The reconstruction shows that Freud’s early theory lends itself to a completely precise logical treatment and has all the features of empirical theories in the social sciences in general.

Keywords

Potential Model Real System Binary Relation Intended Application Natural Realization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balzer, W. (1982). Empirische Theorien: Modelle, Strukturen, Beispiele. Braunschweig-Wiesbaden : Vieweg.Google Scholar
  2. Balzer, W. (1985). Theorie und Messung. Berlin etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Balzer, W. (1986). Theoretical Terms. A New Perspective. The Journal of Philosophy, 83, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., & Sneed, J.D. (1987). An Architectonic for Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1967). Gesammelte Werke. Volume 1, 5th ed. Frankfurt/Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1963). Das Unbewußte. Frankfurt/Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
  7. Gruenbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and Evidence. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Perrez, M. (1979). Ist die Psychoanalyse eine Wissenschaft?. 2nd ed. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  10. Stegmüller, W. (1986). Theorie und Erfahrung. Dritter Teilband. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Balzer
    • 1
  • P. Marcou
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations