Advertisement

Three Dimensional Surface Representations of Linear Elastic Anisotropy in Cubic Single Crystals

  • Edward J. Tucholski
  • Robert E. GreenJr.
Conference paper

Summary

The magnitude of the velocities of the three possible modes of elastic wave propagation are calculated for single crystal chromium, aluminum, and iron at intervals over all possible propagation directions and plotted to form wave velocity surfaces. These materials were chosen because they vary widely in isotropy factor as defined by Kittel [1]. Additionally, the energy flow vectors associated with each mode are found, allowing the angle between the energy flow vector and the propagation direction to be calculated. Energy flux deviation angles are then displayed on three dimensional polar plots to form three dimensional surfaces. The relative elastic anisotropy of these single crystals is compared graphically and quantitatively using isotropy factors.

The maximum longitudinal mode energy flux deviation angles are calculated for a number of cubic crystals. It is shown that near room temperature, maximum longitudinal mode energy flux deviation is linearly related to the isotropy factor. Also the angle with respect to the <100> direction at which this maximum longitudinal mode flux deviation occurs decreases exponentially with the isotropy factor.

Keywords

Direction Cosine Isotropy Factor Wave Velocity Surface Elastic Representation Surface Nondestructive Characterization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Charles Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, (Wiley, New York, 1953), page 52. (This definition is deleted in later editions.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ronald D. Kriz and Hassel M. Ledbetter, “Elastic Representation Surfaces of Unidirectional Graphite/Epoxy Composites,” In Recent Advances in Composites in the United States and Japan: ASTM Special Technical Testing Publication 864, Edited by J. R. Vinson and M. Taya, ( American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.J.P. Musgrave, Crystal Acoustics, (Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert E. Green, Jr., Ultrasonic Investigation of Mechanical Properties, in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, vol. 3, edited by Herbert Herman, (Academic Press, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    David F. Rogers, Procedural Elements for Computer Graphics, (McGraw Hill, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. B. Christoffel, “Ueber die Fortpflanzung von Stössen durch elastische feste Körper,” Annali Di Matematica Pura Ed Applicata, Series II, Vol 8, 193–243 (1877).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. F. S. Hearmon, Landolt-Börnste in: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, Volume 11, edited by K.H. Hellwege, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robert C. Weast, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, (The Chemical Rubber Company, Cleveland, Ohio, 1970).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forman S. Acton, Mathematical Methods that Work, ( Harper and Row, New York, 1970 ).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Schmid and W. Boas, Plasticity of Crystals, (Chapman and Hall, London, 1968).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. E. H. Love, Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Fourth Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1927).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward J. Tucholski
    • 1
  • Robert E. GreenJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Nondestructive Evaluation and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringThe Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations