Advertisement

Quasi-Hopf Algebras and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations

  • V. G. Drinfeld
Part of the Research Reports in Physics book series (RESREPORTS)

Abstract

This paper is a brief exposition of [6]. In §1 we remind the notion of quasitriangular Hopf algebra which is an abstract version of the notion of R-matrix. In §2 the notion of quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebra is introduced (coassociativity is replaced by a weaker axiom). In §3 we construct a class of quasitriangular quasi-Hopf algebras using the differential equations for n-point functions in the WZW theory introduced by V.G.Knizhnik and A.B.Zamolodchikov. Theorem 1 asserts that within perturbation theory with respect to Planck’s constant essentially all quasitriangular quazi-Hopf algebras belong to this class. A natural proof of Kohno’s theorem on the equivalence of two kinds of braid group representations is given. In §4 we discuss applications to knot invariants. In §5 the classical limit of various quantum notions is discussed.

Keywords

Hopf Algebra Braid Group Conformal Field Theory Tensor Category Quasitriangular Hopf Algebra 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.G. Drinfeld. Quantum groups. Proc.ICM-86(Berkeley), vol.1, 798–820. Amer.Math.Soc., 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.D. Faddeev. Integrable models in (1+1) -dimensional quantum field theory (Lectures in Les Houches, 1982), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Lawrence. A universal link invariant using quantum groups (preprint). Mathematical Institute, Oxford University, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.Yu. Reshetikhin. Quasitriangular Hopf algebras and invariants of tangles. Algebra and Analysis, vol.1 (1989), N2, ( Russian).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Jimbo. A q-difference analogue of U(q) and the Yang-Baxter equation. Lett.Math.Phys., vol. 10 (1985), 63–69.CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V.G. Drinfeld. Quasi-Hopf algebras. Algebra and Analysis, to appear. (Russian).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Deligne and J. Milne. Tannakian categories. Lecture Notes in Math., vol.900, 101–228. Springer, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V.G. Knizhnik and A.B. Zamolodchikov. Current algebra and Wess- Zumino models in two dimensions. Nucl.Phys.B, vol. 247 (1984), 83–103.CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Tsuchiya, Yu. Kanie. Vertex operators in conformal field theory on Pi and monodromy representations of braid group. Advanced Studies in Pure Math., vol. 16 (1988), 247–372.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Moore and N. Seiberg. Classical and quantum conformal field theory. Preprint IASSNS-HEP-88/39. Princeton, IAS, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Kohno. Quantized universal enveloping algebras and monodromy of braid groups. Preprint, Nagoya University, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Kohno. Monodromy representations of braid groups and Yang-Baxter equations. Ann.Inst.Fourier, vol.37 (1987) N4, 139–160.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Witten. Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial. Preprint IASSNS-HEP-88/33, Princeton, IAS, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Penrose, W. Rindler. Spinors and space-time, vol.1, Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez and G. Sierra. Quantum group interpetation of some conformal field theories. Preprint CERN-TH- 5267/88. Geneva, 1988.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Moore, N. Reshetikhin. A comment on quantum group symmetry in conformal field theory. Preprint IASSNS-HEP-89/18. Princeton, IAS, 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. G. Drinfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Physico-Technical Institute of Low Temperatures (FTINT)KharkovUSSR

Personalised recommendations