Secondary Formation of Plasmodesmata in Cultured Cells - Structural and Functional Aspects

  • J. Monzer
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 46)

Abstract

Almost immediately after the first description of protoplasmic connections between plant cells (Tangl 1879) the question arose, whether these connections are of cytokinetic origin or if they also could be a result of secondary formation. Strasburger (1901) first described secondary plasmodesmata between partners of a graft. Since then, they have been reported in chimeras (Buder 1911, Hume, 1913, Binding et al. 1987), between parasitic higher plants and their hosts (Dörr 1968, 1969, Tainter 1971, Dell et al. 1982), as well as in grafts (Funck 1929, Jeffree and Yeoman 1983, Kollmann et al. 1985), including the final ultrastructural proof by Kollmann and Glockmann (1985). On the other hand, secondary plasmodesmata have also been proposed to be present in the intact, regularly growing plant. Secondary cell contacts have been reported for the postgenital fusion of carpels (Boeke 1971) and between pollen mother cells (Cheng et al. 1987). Schnepf and Sych (1983), as well as Seagull (1983) observed an increase of plasmodesmata during cell elongation. Closely related to the problem of secondary cell contacts, half plasmodesmata have been described in several studies (Dörr 1968, Boeke 1971, Burgess 1972, Kollmann et al. 1985); presumably these structures are also of secondary origin (cf. Jones 1976, Kollmann and Glockmann 1989). As a major point of interest, the mechanism of secondary plasmodesmata formation has also been discussed over a long period (Strasburger 1901). The course of regular plasmodesmata formation during cell division has been demonstrated to be closely related to cell plate formation (Hepler 1982, cf. Jones 1976). However, for secondary plasmodesmata formation, the situation is less clear. Almost hypothetically, a mechanism of directed enzymic wall degradation has been postulated (Jones 1976, cf. Cheng et al. 1987).

Keywords

Agar Agarose Phytol BioPolymers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binding H, Mordhorst G (1984) Haploid Solanum dulcamara L.: Shoot culture and plant regeneration from isolated protoplasts. Plant Sci Len 35: 77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binding H, Witt D, Monzer J, Mordhorst G, Kollmann R (1987) Plant cell graft chimeras obtained by co-culture of isolated protoplasts. Protoplasma 141: 64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binding H, Görschen E, Jörgensen J, Krumbiegel-Schroeren G, Ling HQ, Rudnick J, Sauer A, Zuba M, Mordhorst G (1988) Proto-plast culture in agarose media with particular emphasis to streaky culture lenses. Botanica Acta 101: 233–239Google Scholar
  4. Boeke JH (1971) Location of the postgenital fusion in the gyno-ecium of Capsella bursapastoris L.. Med Acta Bot Neerl 20: 570–576Google Scholar
  5. Buder J (1911) Studien an Laburnum adami. Z Vererbungsl 5: 209–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess J (1972) The occurrence of plasmodesmata-like struc-tures in a non-division wall. Protoplasma 74: 449–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng KC, Nie XW, Chen SW, Jian LC, Sun LH, Sun DL (1987) Studies on the secondary formation of plasmodesmata between the pollen mother cells of lily before cytomixis. Acta Biol Exper Sinica 20: 1–11Google Scholar
  8. Dell B, Kuo J, Burbidge HH (1982) Anatomy of Pilostyles hamil-tonii (Rafflesiaceae) on stems of Daviesia. Austr J Bot 30: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dörr I (1968) Plasmatische Verbindungen zwischen artfremden Zellen. Naturwissenschaften 55: 396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dörr I (1969) Feinstruktur intrazellulär wachsender Cuscuta- Hyphen. Protoplasma 67: 123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Funck R (1929) Untersuchungen über heteroplastische Transplantationen an Solanaceen und Cactaceen. Beirr Biol Pflanzen 17: 404–468Google Scholar
  12. Hepler PK (1982) Endoplasmic reticulum in the formation of the cell plate and plasïnodesmata.Protoplasma 111: 121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hume M (1913) On the presence of connecting threads in graft hybrids. New Phytol 12: 216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffree CE, Yeoman MM (1983) Development of intercellular connections between opposing cells in a graft union.New Phytol 93: 491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones MGK (1976) The origin and development of plasmodesmata. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular communication in plants: Studies on plasmodesmata. Springer, Berlin, 81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones MGK, Dropkin VH (1976) Scanning electron microscopy of nematode-induced giant transfer cells. Cytobios 15: 149–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kollmann R, Dörr I (1987) Parasitische Blütenpflanzen. Naturwissenschaften 74: 12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kollmann R, Glockmann C (1985) Studies on graft unions I. Plasmodesmata between cells of plants belonging to different unrelated taxa. Protoplasma 124: 224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kollmann R, Glockmann C (1989) Sieve elements in graft unions. In: Behnke HD, Sjolund RD (eds) Sieve elements - Comparative structure and development. Springer, Berlin, in pressGoogle Scholar
  20. Kollmann R, Yang S, Glockmann C (1985) Studies on graft unions II. Continuous and half plasmodesmata in different regions of the graft interface. Protoplasma 126: 19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Monzer J (1989) Strukturelle und funktionelle Aspekte der sekundären Entstehung von Plasmodesmen in Protoplasten-Regeneraten. Thesis, KielGoogle Scholar
  22. Robards AW (1976) Plasmodesmata in higher plants. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW (eds) Intercellular Communication in Plants: Studies on Plasmodesmata. Springer, Berlin, 15–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schnepf E, Sych A (1983) Distribution of plasmodesmata in developing Sphagnum leaflets. Protoplasma 116: 51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seagull RW (1983) Differences in the frequency and disposition of plasmodesmata resulting from root cell elongation. Planta 159: 497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steinbiss HH, Stabel P (1983) Protoplast derived cells can survive capillary microinjection of the fluorescent dye Lucifer Yellow. Protoplasma 116: 223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stoddard FL, McCully ME (1979) Histology of the development of the graft union in pea roots. Can J Bot 57: 1486–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strasburger E (1901) Über Plasmaverbindungen pflanzlicher Zellen. Jb wiss Bot 36: 493–610Google Scholar
  28. Tainter FH (1971) The ultrastructure of Arceuthobium pusillum. Can J Bot 49: 1615–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tangl E (1879) Ueber offene Communicationen zwischen den Zellen des Endosperms einiger Samen. Jb wiss Bot 12: 170–190Google Scholar
  30. Terry BR, Robards AW (1987) Hydrodynamic radius alone governs the mobility of molecules through plasmodesmata.Planta 171: 145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomson WW, Platt-Aloia K (1985) The ultrastructure of the plasmodesmata of the salt glands of Tamarix as revealed by transmission and freeze-fracture electron microscopy.Protoplasma 125: 13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waite JH, Tanzer ML (1981) Polyphenolic substance of Mytilus edulis. Science 212: 1038–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Monzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanisches InstitutUniversität KielKiel 1Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations