Advertisement

Disorder and Interactions in the Hubbard Model

  • G. T. Zimanyi
  • E. Abrahams
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 89)

Abstract

We investigate the single-band repulsive Hubbard model with random site energies as a model for the disordered electron system in the strong-interaction limit. Previous scaling treatments of this problem, pioneered by Finkel’shtein, are based on a perturbative treatment of the interactions and the scaling eventually fails as the couplings become large. We treat the disordered Hubbard model at large repulsion U by a mean-field slave-boson technique coupled with the matrix nonlinear sigma model method to average over the disorder. In first approximation, we find an effective hamiltonian with an attractive coupling inversely proportional to U. A new feature is an enhancement of band narrowing due to the interplay of correlation and disorder. The scaling drives 1/U to weak coupling consistent with the apparent scaling of U to strong coupling in the conventional approach, to which our method is complementary. We find that the conductivity decreases monotonically as the temperature decreases, a new result.

Keywords

Hubbard Model Fermi Liquid Effective Bandwidth Charge Susceptibility Slave Boson 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    F.J.Wegner, Z.Phys.B 35, 207 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    E.Abrahams et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.M.Finkel’shtein, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 84, 168 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. A.M.Finkel’shtein, [Soy. Phys. JETP 57,97 (1983)];Google Scholar
  5. A.M.Finkelshtein, Z.Phys.B 56, 189 (1984).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [4]
    C. Castellani, et al, Phys. Rev. B 30, 527, 1596 (1984).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [5]
    S. Hikami, Phys. Rev. B 24, 2671 (1981).Google Scholar
  8. [6]
    M. Palaanen et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 597 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [7]
    M.Milovanovic et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 82 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [8]
    D.M. Newns and N. Read, Adv. in Physics 36, 799 (1987);Google Scholar
  11. P. Coleman, Phys. Rev. B 35, 5072 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. [9]
    H.Fukuyama in Theory of Heavy Fermions and Valence Fluctuations,eds. T.Kasuya and T.Saso (Springer. 1985). p. 209Google Scholar
  13. [10]
    T.M.Rice and K.Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6420 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. [11]
    G.Kotliar and J.Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1784 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. T. Zimanyi
    • 1
  • E. Abrahams
    • 1
  1. 1.Serin Physics LaboratoryRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations