Skip to main content
  • 328 Accesses

Summary

The study to be reported was aimed at evaluating the reliability of MMS in an automated process control system. The methodology was based on error analysis and took into consideration: a) the error occurred, b) the error detections and c) the recoveries from error. It was adopted to evaluate both a prototype and the implementation of the MMS. The two evaluations had different aims. The first, related to the “design” phase, was aimed at establishing whether the designed tasks, were compatible with the cognitive abilities and competence of the operators. The objective of the second evaluation related to the “re-design” phase, was to identify where and how to improve th MMS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Norman, D.A.: Design rules based on analysis of human error. Communications of the ACM. 26 (1963) 254–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reason, J.T.: Actions not as planned: The prize of automatization. In G. Underwood and R. stevens (eds.) Aspects of consciousnese. Vol. 1. London: Academic Press 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reason, J.T, Lapses of attention, In R. Parasuraman and D. Davies (eds.) varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norman, D.A.: Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review. 88 (1981) 1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Nisbett, R. & Ross, L. Human Inference: Strategies and shortcomings in social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice—Hall 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rasmussen, J., Duncan, K., and Leplat, J. (eds.) New. technology and human error. London: Wiley 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen, J. Information processing and human machine interaction. New York: North Holland 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reason, J.T.: Generic error. modelling system. (GEMS): A cognitive framework for locating Common human error forms. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, and J. Leplat (eds.) New technology and human error. London: Wiley 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D.A. Working papers on errors and error detection. San Diego: University of California 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rizzo, A., Bagnara, S., and Visciola, M.: Human error detection processes. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 27 (1987) 555–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, C., and Norman, D.A.: Designing for error. In D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper (eds.) User centered system design. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchins, E.L., Holland, J.D., and Norman, D.A.: Direct manipulation interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction. 1 (1985) 311–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allwood, C.M.: Error detection processes in statistical problem solving. Cognitive Science. 8 (1984) 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahneman D., and Miller, D.T.: Norm. Theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review.93 (1986) 136–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bagnara, S., Ferrante, D., Rizzo, A., and Stablum, F.: Causal analysis in human computer interaction: When does it occur? Cambridge: Fourth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bagnara, S., Rizzo, A., Stablum, F, and Visciola, M.: “Generics” in human decision making. In H.J. Bullinger and B. Shackel (eds.) Human-computer interaction — INTERACT ’87. Amsterdam: North Holland 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ericsson, K.A., and Simon, H.A.: Protocol analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Partridge, D., and Paap, K.: An introduction to learning. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2 (1988) 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bagnara, S., Rizzo, A., Stablum, F. (1989). Error Analysis in Man-Machine Systems. In: Colombari, V. (eds) Reliability Data Collection and Use in Risk and Availability Assessment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83721-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83721-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83723-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83721-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics