Transgenic Plants and the Study of Plant Development

  • R. Masterson
  • J. Schell
Part of the Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology book series (NUCLEIC, volume 3)


One of the most powerful means for approaching difficult biological problems is our ability to transform and observe directly the trait we are studying. This is as true in E. coli as in the study of one of the most complex of biological phenomena, the process of plant development. It is only during the past 5 years that plant molecular biologists have been able to transform and produce stable, transgenic plants which contain a wide variety of chimeric genes. Several recent reviews cover the many aspects associated with transgenic plants, including their use in the analysis of the molecular organization of plant genes (Schell 1987), and the study of plant gene expression (Kuhlemeier et al. 1987; Willmitzer 1988). This short review focuses on the current uses of transgenic plants for the purpose of studying plant development, in particular work we are presently engaged in. Specifically, this review will discuss the study of Agrobacterium oncogenic genes in transgenic tobacco, and the use of both transposons and T-DNA for insertional mutagenesis in tobacco and Arabidopsis.


Transgenic Plant Hairy Root Transgenic Tobacco Insertional Mutagenesis Crown Gall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andre’ D, Colau D, Schell J, Montagu MV, Hemaisteens J-P (1986) Gene tagging in plants by a T-DNA insertion mutagen that generates APH(3’) II-plant gene fusions. Mol Gen Genet 204: 512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker B, Schell J, Lörz H, Fedoroff N (1986) Transposition of the maize controlling element Activator in tobacco. Proc Nail Acad Sci USA 83: 4844–4848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker B, Coupland G, Fedoroff N, Starlinger P, Schell J (1987) Phenotypic assay for excision of the maize controlling element Ac in tobacco. EMBO J 6: 1547–1554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardarelli M, Mariotti D, Pomponi M, Spano L, Capone I, Costantino P (1987) Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA genes capable of inducing hairy root phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 209:475–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooley L, Kelly R, Spradling A (1988) Insertional mutagenesis of the Drosophila genome with single P elements. Science 239: 1121–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coupland G, Baker B, Schell J, Starlinger P (1988) Characterization of the maize transposable element Ac by internal deletions. EMBO J 7: 3653–3659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Depicker A, Montagu MV, Schell JS (1983) Plant cell transformation by Agrobacterium plasmids. In: Kosuge T, Meredith CP, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic Engineering of plants: an agricultural perspective. Plenum, New York, pp 143–176Google Scholar
  8. Fedoroff NV (1983) Controlling elements in maize. In: Shapiro J (ed) Mobile Genetic Elements. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–63Google Scholar
  9. Fedoroff NV, Furtek DB, Nelson OE (1984) Cloning of the bronze locus in maize by a simple and generalizable procedure using the transposable controlling element Ac. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 3825–3829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fromm M, Taylor LP, Walbot V (1985) Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Prob Natl Acad Sci 82: 5824–5828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horsch RB, Fay JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227: 1229–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kahl G, Schell J (1982) Molecular biology of plant tumors. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Klee HJ, Horsch RB, Hinchee MA, Hein MB, Hoffmann NL (1987) The effects of overproduction of two Agrobacteriurn tumefaciens T-DNA auxin biosynthetic gene products in transgenic petunia plants. Genes and Development 1: 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koncz C, Martini N, Koncz-Kalman Z, Olsson O, Rademiacher A, Szalay A, Schell J (1987) Genetic tools for the analysis of gene expression in higher plants. In: Bruening G, Harada J, Kosuge T, Hollaender A (eds) Tailoring genes for crop improvement. Plenum, New York, pp 197–209Google Scholar
  15. Koncz C, Marini N, Mayerhofer R, Koncz-Kalman Z, Körber H, Redei G, Schell J (1988) T-DNA insertions preferentially tag functional genes in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana. (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  16. Kuhlemeier C, Green PJ, Chua N-M (1987) Regulation of gene expression in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38: 221–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leutwiler LS, Hough-Evans BR, Meyerowitz EM (1984) The DNA of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 194: 15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masterson RV, Biagi K, Wheeler JG, Stadler J, Moms DW (1988) An embryogenic cell line of maize from A188 (Minnesota) contains Mul-like elements. Plant Mol Biol 10: 273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyerowitz EM, Pruitt RE (1985) Arabidopsis thaliana and plant molecular genetics. Science 229:1214–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nester EW, Gordon MP, Amasino RM, Yanofsky MF (1984) Crown gall: a molecular and physiological analysis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35: 387–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paz-Ares J, Weinand U, Peterson P, Saedler H (1986) Molecular cloning of the c locus of Zea mays: a locus regulating the anthocyanin pathway. EMBO J 5: 829–833 )PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rhodes CA, Pierce DA, Mettler U, Mascarenhas D, Detmer JJ (1988) Genetically transformed maize plants from protoplasts. Science 240: 204–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schell JS (1987) Transgenic plants as tools to study the molecular organization of plant genes. Science 237: 1176–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen WH, Petit A, Guem J, Tempe J (1988) Hairy roots are more sensitive to auxin than normal roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 3417–3421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmülling T, Schell J, Spena A (1988) Single genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes influence plant development. EMBO J EMBO J 7: 2621–2629Google Scholar
  26. Spena A, Schmülling T, Koncz C, Schell JS (1987) Independent and synergistic activity of rol A, B, and C loci in stimulating abnormal growth in plants. EMBO J 6: 3891–3899PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Teeri TH, Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Palva ET (1986) Identification of plant promoters in situ by T-DNA mediated transcriptional fusions to the NPTII gene. EMBO J 5: 1755–1760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Sluys MA, Tempe J, Fedoroff N (1987) Studies on the introduction and mobility of the maize Activator element in Arabidopsis thaliana and Daucus carota. EMBO J 6: 3881–3889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vilaine F, Charbonnier C, Casse-Delbart F (1987) Further insight concerning the TL region of the Ri plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4: transfer of a 1.9 kb fragment is sufficient to induce transformed roots on tobacco leaf fragments. Mol Gen Genet 210: 111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White FF, Taylor BH, Huffman GA, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1985) Molecular and genetic analysis of the transferred DNA regions of the root-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. J Bacteriol 164: 33–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wienand U, Saedler H (1987) Plant transposable elements: unique structures for gene tagging and cloning. In: Hohn J, Schell J, (eds) Plant gene research, vol 4, Plant DNA infectious agents. Springer, Vienna New York, pp 205–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Willmitzer L (1988) The use of transgenic plants to study plant gene expression. Trends Genet 4: 13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Masterson
  • J. Schell
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für ZüchtungsforschungKöln 30Germany

Personalised recommendations