Placing Dynamic Sensors and Actuators on Flexible Space Structures

  • Gregory A. Norris
  • Robert E. Skelton
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Abstract

This paper selects sensors and actuators (location, type and number) from an admissible set. We seek an approximate solution to this integer programming problem. Given the optimal use of the entire admissible set of sensors and actuators, it is possible to decompose the quadratic cost function into contributions from each stochastic input and each weighted output. In the past, these suboptimal cost decomposition methods of sensor and actuator selection have been used to locate perfect (infinite bandwidth) sensors and actuators on large scale systems. This paper extends these ideas to the more practical case of imperfect actuators and sensors with dynamics of their own. Secondly, the old cost decomposition methods are discarded for improved formulas for sensor and actuator deletion (from the admissible set). These results show that there exists an optimal number of actuators (it is possible to use too few and too many). Preliminary attempts to solve this new research question are described. It is also shown that there exists optimal dynamics of the actuators. NASA’s SCOLE example demonstrates the concepts.

Keywords

Covariance Balas Starke 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

List of References

  1. [1]
    Skelton, R.E., and Norris, G.A., “Selection of Noisy Sensors and Actuators in the Presence of Correlated Noise,” Journal of Control Theory and Advanced Technology to appear.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Skelton, R.E., and De Lorenzo, M.L., “Selection of Noisy Actuators and Sensors in Linear Stochastic Systems,” Journal of Large Scale Systems, Theory and Applications Vol. 4, April 1983, pp. 109–136.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Skelton, R.E., and DeLorenzo, M.L., “Space Structure Control Design by Variance Assignment,” Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 8, July-August 1985, pp. 454–462.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    De Lorenzo, M.L., “Selection of Noisy Sensors and Actuators for Regulation of Linear Systems,” Ph.D. Thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, May 1983.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Skelton, R.E., and Hughes, P.C., “Modal Cost Analysis for Linear Matrix-Second- Order Systems,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control Vol. 102, Sept. 1980.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Howell, K.C., and Baxter, M.J., “Some Considerations of Actuator Dynamics in the Attitude Control of a Flexible Beam,” (AIAA/AAS Paper 86–2124).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Chiu, J.D. and Skelton, R.E., “Optimal Selection of Inputs and Outputs in Linear Stochastic Systems,” J. Astronautical Sciences Vol. XXXI, No. 3, pp. 399–414, July-Sept. 1983.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Goh, C.J., and Caughey, T.K., “On the Stability Problem Caused by Finite Actuator Dynamics in the Collocated Control of Large Space Structures,” Int. J. Control Vol. 41, No. 3,1985, pp. 787–802.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Balas, M.J., “Feedback Control of Flexible Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Vol. AC-23, No. 4,1978, pp. 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Malandrakis, C.G., “Optimal Sensor and Controller Allocation for a Class of Distributed Parameter Systems,” Int. J. Syst. Sci. Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 463–480, Sept. 1980.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ichikawa, A. and Ryan, E.P., “Filtering and Control of Distributed Parameter Systems with Point Observations and Inputs,” Proc. of the 2nd IFAC Symp. on Control of D.P.S. pp. 347–357, Coventry, Jul. 1977.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ichikawa, A. and Ryan, E.P., “Sensor and Controller Location Problems for Distributed Parameter Systems,” Automatica Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 347–352, May 1979.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hughes, P.C., “Space Structure Vibration Modes: How Many Exist? Which ones are Important?” IEEE Control Systems Magazine February 1987, pp. 22–28.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schaechter, D.B., “Control Technology Development,” NASA Langley Research Center LSS Tech. Mar 1982, pp. 297–311.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Taylor, L.W., and Balakrishnan, A.V., “A Mathematical Problem and a Spacecraft Control Laboratory Experiment (SCOLE) Used to Evaluate Control Laws for Flexible Spacecraft... NASA/IEEE Design Challenge,” January 1984, unpublished, available from Lawrence W. Taylor, Jr., Spacecraft Control Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23665.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hotz, A.F., Collins, E., and Skelton, R.E., “Linearized Dynamic Model for the NASA/IEEE SCOLE Configuration,” NASA Contractor Report 172394, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Sept. 1984.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    King, A.M., Norris, G.A., and Skelton, R.E., “Controller Design for Vibration and Shape Control of an Offset Reflector Satellite,” contractor report to SPARTA, Inc., May 1986.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Norris, G.A., “Selection of Non-Ideal Noisy Actuators and Sensors in the Control of Linear Systems, “ Master’s Thesis, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, May 1987.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    McClamrock, H. “Control of Large Space Structures Using Electro-Mechanical Actuators,” CSDL-P-1607, The Charles Starke Draper Lab., Inc., Cambridge, Mass., July 1982.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hautus, M.L.J., “Input Regularity of Cascaded Systems,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control Vol. AC-20, No. 1, Feb. 1975, pp. 120–123.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hughes, P.C., and R.E. Skelton, “Controllability and Observability of Linear Matrix Second Order Systems,” J. Applied Mechanics Vol. 47, June 1980, pp. 452–459.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Laskin, R.A., R.W. Longman, and P.W. Likins, “Actuator Placement in Modal Systems Using Bounded-Time Fuel-Optimal Degree of Controllability,” Proceedings 20th Annual Allerton Conference on Comm. Control and Computing Oct. 6–8,1982, pp. 813–822.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Chen, W.H., and J.H. Seinfeld, “Optimal Location of Process Measurements.” Int. J. Control 21,6,1003–1014,1975.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory A. Norris
    • 1
  • Robert E. Skelton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations