Bone Banking in Community Hospitals

  • A. A. Czitrom


It has become apparent that replacement of bone stock is necessary at an increasing rate during revision and reconstructive surgery after failed total joint arthroplasty [4, 5]. This requires the availability of banked bone. Since complex tissue banking is expensive, all large regional and institutional bone banks are limited to tertiary care centers. These institutions cannot supply sufficient banked allograft bone at a national level. On the other hand, patient access to tertiary care centers is limited and transfer of increasing numbers of patients to such centers is not practical. These considerations give a rationale for bone banking and the use of banked allograft bone at the local community hospital level. Although the logistics of bone banking in local community hospitals are different from those of complex banking procedures, the general guidelines that ensure reliable preservation, safety, and availability of banked bone apply in the same manner as established previously for regional and institutional tissue banks [1, 3]. Community bone banking requires safe, simple, and cost-effective methods or preservation. These criteria are best met by deep-freezing. Advantages of deep-frozen allografts (bank bone) over fresh autografts are: unlimited quantity, no donor site morbidity, and maintained osteoconductive function. Their disadvantages are: lack of osteogenic and osteoinductive function, slow healing rate, and potential to sensitize the recipient.


Community Hospital Tertiary Care Center Community Banking Bone Banking Traumatic Amputation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Association of Tissue Banks (1979) Guidelines for the banking of musculoskeletal tissues: Am Assoc Tissue Banks Newslett 3: 2–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedlaender GE (1976) Personnel and equipment required for a “complete” tissue bank. Transplant Proc 8: 235–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friedlaender GE, Mankin HJ (1981) Bone banking: current methods and suggested guidelines. In: Murray DG (ed) AAOS instructional course lectures, vol 30. Mosby, St Louis, pp 36–55Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gross AE, Lavoie MV, McDermott P, Marks P (1985) The use of allograft bone in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 197: 115–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris WH (1982) Allografting in total hip arthroplasty in adults with severe acetabular deficiency including a surgical technique for bolting the graft to the ilium. Clin Orthop 162: 150–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hart MM, Campbell ED, Kartub MG (1986) Bone banking. A cost effective method for establishing a community hospital bone bank. Clin Orthop 206: 295–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson CA, Brown BA, Lasky LC (1985) Rh immunization caused by osseous allo-graft. N Engl J Med 312: 121–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomford WW, Ploetz JE, Mankin HJ (1986) Bone allografts of femoral heads: procurement and storage. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63A: 534–537Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Czitrom
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Combined Orthopaedic DivisionToronto General Hospital and Mount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and ImmunologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations