Advertisement

Semantic Processing in Speech Understanding

  • G. Thurmair
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 46)

Abstract

This paper will try to evaluate the state of the art in semantic representation techniques as far as they are used in speech understanding systems. It will not deal with knowledge representation techniques in general, because only some of them are used and are even usable in speech environment. First, a scetch of the problem domain will be given: Recognition levels, search spaces and system design decisions are outlined, and from this, the task of linguistic analysis procedures is derived. Second, existing techniques to incorporate semantic information into the Speech Understanding task are presented and discussed, like statistics, semantic markers, semantic grammars etc. Third, two approaches for Speech Understanding are discussed: predicate logic as representation as used in the SPIC0S system, and semantic frames as used in the CMU-DARPA project. At the end, two proposals of possible system architectures are presented.

Keywords

Semantic Information Semantic Feature Syntactic Analysis Word Lattice Speech Understanding 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. /BEU 85/.
    R.J. Beun: PLANNER: ontwerp en implementatie van een systeem voor hat genereren vam dialooghandelingen. IPO-Report 472, Eindhoven 1985Google Scholar
  2. /BL0 86/.
    U. Block, M. Gehrke, H. Haugeneder, R. Hunze: Wissens-repraesentationen im natuerlichsprachlichen Beratungssystem WISBER. Siemens Report 1986Google Scholar
  3. /BRI 84/ A. Brietzmann: Semantische und pragmatische Analyse im Erlanger Spracherkennungsprojekt. Erlangen 1984Google Scholar
  4. /BRE 86/.
    A. Brietzmann, U. Ehrlich:The Role of Semantic Processing in an Automatic Speech Understanding System. Proc. COLING Bonn 1986Google Scholar
  5. /BRO 86/.
    C. J. van Deemter, G. Brockhoff, H. Bunt, M. Meya, J. de Vet: From TENDUM to SPIC0S. IPO Annual Progress Report 1985.Google Scholar
  6. /BUN 85/.
    H. Bunt: Mass Nouns and Model Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge Univ. Press 1985Google Scholar
  7. /COO 76/ W. Cooper: Speech Timing of Coreference. Proc. IEEE Philadelphia 76Google Scholar
  8. /DRE 87/.
    G. Dreckschmidt: The Linguistic Component in the Speech Understanding System SPIC0S. Proc GLDV 1987 Bonn (in: H. Tillmann, G. Willee: Analyse und Synthese gesprochener Sprache. Hildesheim 1987).Google Scholar
  9. /FIL68/.
    Ch. Filmore: A Case for Case. 1968Google Scholar
  10. /FIB 86/.
    P. Fink, A. Biermann: The correction of ill-formed input using History based Expectation with Applications to Speech Understanding. Computational Linguistics 12/1986Google Scholar
  11. /FIB 86/.
    /FUJ 86/ H. Fujisaki, K. Hirose, H. Udagawa, N. Kanedera: A new approach to continuous Speech Recognition based on Considerations on Human Process of Speech Perception. Proc. ICASSP 86 TokyoGoogle Scholar
  12. /GRI 86/.
    R. Grishman, L. Hirshman, N. Thanh Nanh: Discovery Procedures of Sublanguage Selectional Patterns. Computational Linguistics 12/86Google Scholar
  13. /HAR 84/.
    T. Harley: A Critique of top-down levels of speech production. Cognitive Science 8/1984Google Scholar
  14. /HAT 86/.
    K. Hatazaki, T. Watanabe: A Linguistic Processor for Japanese Speech Recognition. Proc. ICASSP 1986 TokyoGoogle Scholar
  15. /HAT 82/.
    J. Haton, J. Pierrel, S. Sabbagh: Semantic and Pragmatic Processing in Continuous Speech Understanding, in: J. Haton, ed.: Automatic Speech Analysis and Recognition. Reidel 1982Google Scholar
  16. /HAY 86/.
    Ph. Hayes, A. Hauptmann, J. Carbonell, J. Tomita: Parsing Spoken Language, A Semantic Caseframe Approach. Proc COLING 1986 BonnGoogle Scholar
  17. /HEA 77/ HEARSAY-Report 1976: Speech Understanding Systems. Summary of ResultsGoogle Scholar
  18. /KAF 64/.
    J. Katz, J. Fodor: The structure of a semantic theory. Language 1963Google Scholar
  19. /MEY 86/.
    M. Meya: The Semantics of SPICOS. Siemens Report 1986Google Scholar
  20. /MUD 84/ J. Mudler, E. Paulus: Entwicklung und Erprobung der erwartungsorientierten Analyse fuer die automatische Spracherkennung. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 8,1984Google Scholar
  21. /NIE 86/.
    G. Niedermair: Divided and Valency-oriented Parsing in Speech Understanding. Proc. COLING 1986 BonnGoogle Scholar
  22. /N0E 87/.
    E. Noeth, A. Batliner, R. Lang, W. Oppenrieder: Automatische Grundfrequenzanalysen und Satzmodusdifferenzierung. Proc. GLDV Bonn 1987Google Scholar
  23. /SHI 86/ M. Shigenaga et al.: A Speech Recognition System for Continuously spoken Japanese Sentences - Speech Yamanashi. Japan IECE Transactions, 69, 1986Google Scholar
  24. /WIN 82/.
    T. Winograd: Language as a Cognitive Process. 1982Google Scholar
  25. /WOO 80/.
    J. Wolf, W. Woods: The HWIM Speech Understanding System, in: W. Lea, ed: Automatic Speech Recognition. London 1980Google Scholar
  26. /ZEW 86/.
    C. Zelinski-Wibbelt: An Emprirically based Approach towards a system of Semantic Features. Proc. COLING 1986 BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Thurmair
    • 1
  1. 1.Siemens AGD-8 Munich 83Germany

Personalised recommendations