Skip to main content

The Comprehensive Cohort Study: The Use of Registry Data to Confirm and Extend a Randomized Trial

  • Conference paper
Cancer Clinical Trials

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 111))

Abstract

The randomized clinical trial is usually the best method of comparing treatment modalities because it is unbiased. However, there is sometimes concern that the patients in the trial are not representative of all patients who could be treated. Thus, the trial results may be unbiased but not generalizable. A means of verifying the external validity of the trial is given by the comprehensive cohort study design (Olschewski and Scheurlen 1985). In this design, all available eligible patients are enrolled whether or not they consent to randomized treatment assignment. The design is essentially a prospective cohort study with a randomized subcohort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Campeau L, Enjalbert M, Lesperance J, Vaislic C, Grondin CM, Bourassa MG (1983) Atherosclerosis and late graft closure of aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts: sequential angiographic studies at 2 weeks, 1 year, 5 to 7 years, and 10 to 12 years after surgery. Circulation 68 [Suppl II]: II-1

    Google Scholar 

  • CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates: Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) (1983 a) A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery, survival data. Circulation 68:939–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates: Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) (1983 b) A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Quality of life in patients randomly assigned to treatment groups. Circulation 68: 951–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates: Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) (1984a) A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Comparability of entry characteristics and survival in randomized and nonrandomized patients meeting randomization criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates (1984 b) Myocardial infarction and mortality in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) randomized trial. N Engl J Med 310: 750–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaitman BR, Davis K, Fisher LD, Bourassa MG, Mock MB, Lesperance J, Rogers WJ, Fray D, Tyras DH, Judkins MP, Ringqvist I, Killip T (1983) A life-table and Cox regression analysis of patients with combined proximal left anterior descending and proximal circumflex coronary artery disease: non-left main equivalent lesions (CASS). Circulation 68: 1163–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis KB, Fisher L, Gillespie MJ, Pettinger M (1985) A test of the National Death Index using the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Controlled Clin Trials 6: 179–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gersh BJ, Kronmal RA, Schaff HV, Frye RL, Ryan TJ, Mock MB, Myers WO, Athearn MW, Gosselin AJ, Kaiser GC, Bourassa MG, Killip T (1985) Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and medical therapy in patients 65 years of age or older. N Engl J Med 313: 217–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser GC, Davis KB, Fisher LD, Myers WO, Foster ED, Passamani ER, Gillespie MJ (1985) Survival following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe angina pectoris (CASS). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 89: 513–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olschewski M, Scheurlen H (1985) Comprehensive cohort study: an alternative to randomized consent design in a breast preservation trial. Meth Inf Med 24: 131–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Principal Investigators of CASS and Their Associates (Killip T, editor, Fisher LD, Mock MB, associate editors) (1981) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). Circulation 63 [Suppl I]: 11–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Davis, K. (1988). The Comprehensive Cohort Study: The Use of Registry Data to Confirm and Extend a Randomized Trial. In: Scheurlen, H., Kay, R., Baum, M. (eds) Cancer Clinical Trials. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83421-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83419-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics