Skip to main content

Treatment by Protocol: Assessment of Gains and Losses

  • Conference paper
Cancer Clinical Trials

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 111))

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

Treatment as a mutilating and hazardous intervention — an injury in legal terms - requires an explanation. With a perception of the biology of a given disease in mind, based on available evidence accumulated so far, one first of all has to weigh costs, risks, and benefits of all feasible interventions. Diagnostic procedures prior to remedial interventions and subsequent differential treatments should be specified in advance. Finally, an attempt should be made to account for the outcome of an intervention. In a broad sense, it is this three-point statement — background information, strategy for actions, strategy for analyzing results — that constitutes a protocol. Any intervention by protocol may be called a therapy.

To Professor Herbert Immich on his 70th birthday.

I would like to thank John Haybittle, Richard Kay, and Martin Schumacher for their helpful suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baum M (1985) Selection for endocrine treatment. Rev Endocr Rel Cancer (Suppl) 16: 33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Byar DP, Green SB (1980) The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: applications to prostate cancer. Bull Cancer (Paris) 67: 477–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doksum K (1974) Empirical probability plots and statistical inferences for nonlinear models in the two-sample case. Ann Stat 2: 267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Fisher ER, Redmond C et al. (1986) Ten-year results from the NSABP clinical trial evaluating the use of L-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 4: 929–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheurlen H, Olschewski M, Leibbrand D (1984) Zur Methodologie kontrollierter klinischer Studien über die Primärbehandlung des operablen Mammakarzinoms. Strahlentherapie 160: 459–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scheurlen, H. (1988). Treatment by Protocol: Assessment of Gains and Losses. In: Scheurlen, H., Kay, R., Baum, M. (eds) Cancer Clinical Trials. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83421-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83419-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics