Skip to main content

Abstraction and Inference Mechanisms for Knowledge Representation

  • Chapter
Foundations of Knowledge Base Management

Part of the book series: Topics in Information Systems ((TINF))

Abstract

The use of the clausal institution for structuring and using knowledge is advocated on the basis that it leads to the integration of the logical, structural and procedural knowledge representation paradigms. The knowledge base is identified with a structured theory in this institution. Every knowledge representation approach is defined as a collection of parameterized theories (abstractions) which can be used for building knowledge bases, as well as new abstractions. The resulting knowledge base has an explicit structure complying with the chosen knowledge representation approach and can be accessed using clausal logic general purpose inference mechanisms. Moreover, the procedural semantics of clausal logic provides direct means to support the procedural viewpoint. Within the proposed framework, effective tools are introduced for the modular construction of structured clausal knowledge bases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burstall, R., and J. Goguen, “The Semantics of Clear: A Specification Language”, in D. Bjorner (ed.), Abstract Software Specifications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burstall, R., and J. Goguen, “An Informal Introduction to the Semantics of Clear”, in R. Boyer and J. Moore (eds.), The Correctness Problem in Computer Science, Academic Press, London, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brachman, R., V. Gilbert, and H. Levesque, “An Essential Hybrid Reasoning System: Knowledge and Symbol Level Account of Krypton”, Proc. 1985 AAAI Conference, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carapusa, R., and F. Fiaderro, “Varying Representation Schemata vs Fact Updating in KB Management”, in R. Meersman and A. Sernadas (eds.), Knowledge and Data (DS-2), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, P.P.S., “The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, March 1976, pp. 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coelho, H., A. Rodrigues, and A. Sernadas, “Towards Knowledge-Based Infolog Specifications”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 1, No.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goguen, J., and R. Burstall, “Introducing Institutions”, in E. Clarke and D. Kozen (eds.), Logics of Programs, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kowalski, R.A., Logic for Problem Solving, North-Holland, New York, 1979.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mylopoulous, J., and M.L. Brodie, “AI and Databases: Semantics vs Computational Theories of Information”, in G. Ariav and J. Clifford (eds.), New Directions for Database Systems, Ablex Publishing Company, Norwood, NJ, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sernadas, A., and C. Sernadas, “Capturing Knowledge About the Organization Dynamics”, in L. Methlie and R. Sprague (eds.), Knowledge Representation for DSS, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sernadas, A., and C. Sernadas, “The Use of E-R Abstractions tor Knowledge Representation”, in P. Chen (ed.), The Entity-Relationship Concept in Knowledge Representation, IEEE, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sernadas, C., and A. Sernadas, “Conceptual Modelling Abstractibn Mechanisms as Parameterized Theories in Institutions”, in R. Meersman and T. Steel (eds.), Database Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vilain, M., “The Restricted Language Architecture of a Hybrid Representation System”, Proc. 1985 AAAI Conference, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sernadas, A., Sernadas, C. (1989). Abstraction and Inference Mechanisms for Knowledge Representation. In: Schmidt, J.W., Thanos, C. (eds) Foundations of Knowledge Base Management. Topics in Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83397-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83397-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83399-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83397-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics