Performance of Echographic Equipment and Potentials for Tissue Characterization

  • J. M. Thijssen
  • B. J. Oosterveld
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 39)


The imaging performance of echographic equipment is greatly depenlent on the characteristics of the ultrasound transducer. The paper is confined to single element focussed transducers which are still widely employed in modern equipment. Extrapolation of the results to array transducers maybe made to a certain extent. The performance is specified by the 2 dimensional point spread function (PSF) in the focal zone of the transmitted sound field. This PS? is fixed by the bandwidth of the transducer when the axial (depth) direction is considered, and by the central frequency and the relative aperture in the lateral direction. The PSF concept applies to the imaging of specular reflections and the PSF is estimated by scanning a single reflector. In case of scattering by small inhomogeneities within parenchymal tissues the concept of “speckle” formation has to be introduced. The speckle is due to interference phenomena at reception. It can be shown that the average speckle size in the focus is proportional to the PSF above defined for specular reflections. The dependencies of the speckle size on the distance of the tissue to the transducer (beam diffraction effects) and on the density of the scatterers were explored. It is concluded that with the necessary corrections tissue characterization by statistical analysis of the image texture can be meaningful.


Point Spread Function Image Texture Focal Zone Laser Speckle Sound Beam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, J.G. and Thurstone, F.L. (1979). Acoustic speckle: theory and experimental analysis, Ultrasonic Imag. 1,pp. 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamber, J.C. and Dickinson R.J. (1980). Ultrasonic B-scanning: a computer simulation: Phys. Med. Biol., 25, pp. 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burckhardt, C.B. (1978). Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans, IEEE Trans. SU-25, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Cosgrove, D.O. (1980). Ultrasonic tissue characterization in the liver. In: Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization, J.M. Thijssen (ed.), Stafleu, Alphen a/d Rijn, pp. 84–90.Google Scholar
  5. Flax, S.W., Glover, G.H. and Pelc, N.J. (1981). Textural variations in B-mode ultrasonography: a stochastic model, Ultrasonic Imag. 3, pp. 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman, J.W. (1975). Statistical properties of laser speckle patterns. In: Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, J.C. Dainty (ed.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 9–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Insana, M.F., Wagner R.F., Garra, B.S., Brown, D.G. and Shawker, T.H. (1985). Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized rician statistics. In: Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instr. Engrs (SPIE) 56, pp. 153–159.Google Scholar
  8. Kossoff, G., Garrett, W.J., Carpenter, D.A., Jellins, J. and Dadd, M.J. (1976). Principles and classification of soft tissues by gray scale echography, Ultrasound Med. 2, pp. 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kossoff, G. (1979). Analysis of the focussing action of spherically curved transducers: Ultrasound Med. 5, pp. 359–365.Google Scholar
  10. Nicholas, D. (1982). Evaluation of backscattering coefficients for excised human tissues: results, interpretation and associated results: Ultrasound Med. 8, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
  11. Oosterveld, B.J., Thijssen, J.M. and Verhoef, W.A. (1985). Texture of B-mode echograms: 3-D simulations and experiments of the effects of diffraction and scatterer density, Ultrasonic Imag. 7, pp. 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Papoulis, A. (1965). Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Thijssen, J.M. and Oosterveld, B.J. (1985). Texture in B-mode echograms: a simulation study of the effects of diffraction and of scatterer density on gray scale statistics. In: Acoustical Imaging, Vol. 14. A.J. Berkhout, J. Ridder, and L.F. van der Wal (eds.), Plenum, New York, pp. 481–485.Google Scholar
  14. Thijssen, J.M. and Oosterveld, B.J. (1986). Texture of echographic B-mode images. In: Proceedings SIDUO XI Congress, Capri, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Verhoef, W.A., Cloostermans, M.J. and Thijssen, J.M. (1984). The impulse response of a focussed source with an arbitrary axisymmetric surface velocity distribution, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 75, pp. 1716–1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagner, R.F., Smith, S.W., Sandrik, J.M. and Lopez, H. (1983). Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans, IEEE Trans. SU-30, pp. 156–163.Google Scholar
  17. Wagner, R.F., Insana, M.F. and Brown, D.G. (1985). Unified approach to the detection and classification of speckle texture in diagnostic ultrasound. In: Proc. Soc. Photo-opt. Instr. Engrs (SPIE) 556, pp. 146–152.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Thijssen
    • 1
  • B. J. Oosterveld
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations