Hospital Law pp 161-168 | Cite as

Do Not Resuscitate (DNR): How to Decide, Who Should Decide, and Why?

  • A. C. Hoffman
  • M. X. Van Cura
  • B. B. Van Cura
Part of the Medicolegal Library book series (MEDICOLEGAL, volume 7)


The fate of Socrates, ordered to drink the fatal cup of hemlock, had been decided. His future was in the hands of God, but the fate and future of so-called do not resuscitate (DNR) and no-code patients is an area of indecision and confusion in present-day medicine. With the advent of modern, life-sustaining techniques and life-support systems, resuscitation of patients suffering from cardiac and respiratory arrest became possible. However, with technology capable of sustaining cardiac and respiratory function, concern grew among physicians, other health professionals, attorneys, and the public. This concern arose over the application and viability of DNR-code orders. The existence of such orders in medical records raised concern for legal liability and most importantly, concern for the patient. An understanding of the various medical, legal, and ethical aspects of such orders, and definitive guidelines for medical policies in these situations are mandated. The fate and future of the patient, and life as we know it, cannot be guided by indecision and confusion.


Life Support Brain Death Competent Patient Incompetent Patient Permanent Vegetative State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Sterling-Rollheiser E (1983) How neurological nurses cope with the “no code” patient. J Neuro-surg Nursing 15: 274–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kunkel J, Wiley J (1979) Acute head injury. Nursing 9: 22–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Suber D, Tabor W (1982) Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: Who decides? JAMA 18: 2250–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoffman AC, Van Cura MX (1979) Death: a medical dilemma, a legal answer. Legal Med Q 2: 110–122Google Scholar
  5. Hoffman AC, Van Cura MX (1978) Death: the five brain criteria. Med Trial Technique Q 4: 377–407Google Scholar
  6. Showalter J, Andrew F (1984) To treat or not to treat: Catholic Health AssocGoogle Scholar
  7. Kapp M (1982) Response to the living will furor: Directives for Maximum care. Am J Med 72: 855–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lo B, Steinbrook R (1983) Deciding whether to resuscitate. Arch Intern Med 143: 1561–1563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. In re Quinlan, 355 A. 2d 647 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. Superintendant of Belchertown v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E. 2d 417 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. In re Dinnerstein, 380 N.E. 2d (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Hoffman
  • M. X. Van Cura
  • B. B. Van Cura

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations