Investigation of Undoped and Alkali-Metal Doped Poly(p-phenylene Selenide)

  • W. Czerwiński
  • J. Fink
  • N. Nücker
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 76)


In the last few years, conducting polymers with non-degenerate ground state and with conductivity mechanisms somewhat different from the case of transpolyacetylene have attracted strong interest. Polaron-type defects in these polymers (Polyparaphenylene (PPP), Polypyrrole (PP), Polythiophene (PT), Polyparaphenylene sulfide (PPS)) leading to the presence of quinoid structure segments, have been theoretically predicted [1] and are expected to depend on the presence of impurities [2] as well as on the chain length of the polymer [3]. Another polymer with a non-degenerate ground state is polyparaphenylene selenide (PPSe) which was investigated up to now only incidentally [4,5]. Moreover, investigations on the electronic structure of PPSe have not been reported up to date. It is known [6] that polyparaphenylene sulfide doped by strong p-dopant molecules has a rather high conductivity (∿1 S/cm). Substitution of sulfur by selenium may be favourable for high conductivity due to the increased metallic character of selenium and due to a decrease in electronegativity. Moreover, there is experimental evidence [7,8] that doped selenium compounds have higher conductivities than similar sulfur systems. However, also opposite results were reported [4]. In this contribution we have used electron energy loss spectroscopy and electron diffraction to investigate the electronic and crystal structure of undoped and doped PPSe.


Electron Diffraction High Conductivity Repeat Unit Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy Poly Thiophene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.L. Brédas, B. Thémans, J.G. Fripiat, and J.M. André: Phys. Rev. B 219, 6761 (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Sanechika, T. Yamamoto, and A. Yamamoto: J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 20, 365(1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L.W. ShackTette, H. Eckhardt, R.R. Chance, G.G. Miller, D.M. Ivory, and R.H. Baughman: In Polymer Science and Technology, ed. by R.B. Seymour (Plenum Press, New York 1981) p.115Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Tanaka, M. Sato, K. Kaeriyama, H. Kanetsuna, M. Kato, Y. Suda: Macromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 4, 231 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.J. Sandman, M. Rubner, and L. Samuelson: J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1133 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.F. Rabolt, T.C. Clarke, K.K. Kanazawa, J.R. Reynolds, and G.B. Street: J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 348 (1980)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.H. Perlstein: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 16, 519 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Guenther, M.D. Bezoari, P. Kovacic, S. Gronowitz, A.B. Hörnfeldt: J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 22, 65 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Czerwiński, S. Nielek, M. Welniak: to be published in “Angew. Makromol. Chem.”Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Fink: Z. Phys. B — Condensed Matter 61, 463 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Crecelius, J. Fink, J.J. Ritsko, M. Stamm, H.-J. Freund and H. Gonska: Phys. Rev. B 28, 1802 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Fink, B. Scheerer, M. Stamm, B. Tieke, B. Kanellakopulos, and E. Dornberger: Phys. Rev. B, Rap. Commun. 30, 4867 (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Czerwiński
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Fink
    • 1
  • N. Nücker
    • 1
  1. 1.Kernforschungszentrum KarlsruheInstitut für Nukleare FestkörperphysikKarlsruheFed.Rep.of Germany
  2. 2.Institute of ChemistryUniversity N. CopernicusTorunPoland

Personalised recommendations