Advertisement

On Polaron and Bipolaron Formation in Conducting Polymers

  • F. Devreux
  • F. Genoud
  • M. Nechtschein
  • B. Villeret
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 76)

Abstract

Spin concentration has been measured as a function of charge injection in polypyrrole, polyaniline, and polydithiophene. Analysis of the data in terms of polarons and bipolarons in thermodynamical equilibrium leads to polarons and bipolarons nearly degenerate for polypyrrole and polyaniline. In the case of polydithiophene the data support the bipolarons as the fundamental charged species. However, the spin susceptibility does not decrease at low temperature as expected for fundamental spinless species. We propose that the polaron pairing is hindered by potential barriers and, consequently, polarons and bipolarons are not in thermodynamical equilibrium.

Keywords

Poly Thiophene Charge Injection European Economic Community Spin Susceptibility Spin Concentration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.C. Scott, P. Pfluger, M.T. Krounbi and G.B. Street: Phys. Rev. B 28, 2140 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Moraes, D. Davidov, M. Kobayashi, T.C. Chung, J. Chen, A.J. Heeger and F. Wudl: Synth. Met. 10, 169 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Chen, A.J. Heeger and F. Wudl: Sol. St. Comm. 58, 251 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Mizoguchi, K. Misoo, K. Kume, K. Kaneto, T. Shiraishi and K. Yoshino: Synth. Met. 18, 195 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Colaneri, M. Nowak, D. Spiegel, S. Hotta and A.J. Heeger: preprintGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Kaneto, Y. Kohno and K. Yoshino: Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 118, 217 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    a) M. Kaya, A. Kitani, and K. Sasaki: Chem. Lett. 147 (1986)Google Scholar
  8. b).
    S.H. Glarum and J.H. Marshall: J. Phys. Chem. 90, 6076 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. c).
    A.G. McDiarmid, J.C. Chiang, A.F. Richter, and A.J. Epstein: Synth. Met. 18, 285 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    F. Genoud, M. Guglielmi, M. Nechtschein, E. Genies and M. Salmon: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 118 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    M. Nechtschein, F. Devreux, F. Genoud, E. Vieil, J.M. Pernaut and E. Geniès: Synth. Met. 15, 59 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 10.
    J.L. Bredas, B. Themans, J.G. Fripiat, J.M. André and R.R. Chance: Phys. Rev. B 29, 6761 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    F. Devreux: Europhysics. Lett. 1, 233 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    A.J. Epstein et al.: Synth. Met. 18, 303 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    F. Devreux, F. Genoud, M. Nechtschein, J.P. Travers and G. Bidan: J. Phys. C3, 621(1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Devreux
    • 1
  • F. Genoud
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Nechtschein
    • 1
  • B. Villeret
    • 1
  1. 1.DRF-G/SPh/DSPE-ER, CNRS 216Centre d’Etudes Nucléaires de GrenobleGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Medicale Et Technique De GrenobleUniversite ScientifiqueFrance

Personalised recommendations