Computational and Experimental Studies of LEBUS at High Device Reynolds Numbers

  • Arild Bertelrud
  • R. D. Watson
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Abstract

The present paper summarizes computational and experimental studies for large-eddy breakup devices (LEBUs). LEBU optimization using a computational approach considering compressibility, Reynolds number, and the unsteadiness of the flow and experiments with LEBUs at high Reynolds numbers in flight are discussed. The measurements include streamwise as well as span-wise distributions of local skin friction. The unsteady flow around the LEBU devices as well as far downstream are characterized by the strain-gage measurements on the devices and hot-wire readings downstream. Computations are made with available time-averaged and quasi-stationary techniques to find suitable device profiles with minimum drag.

Keywords

Beach Vorticity Compressibility Boulder Verse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bushnell, D.M.: Turbulent Drag Reducltion for External Flows. AIAA 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NY, Jan. 10–13, 1983, Paper No. 83–0227.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corke, T.C., Nagib, H.M., and Guezennec, Y.G.: A New View on Origin, Role and Manipulation of Large Scales in Turbulent. Boundary Layers. NASA CR-165861, Febr. 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertelrud, A., Truong, T.V., and Avellan, F.: Drag Reduction in Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Ribbons. AIAA 9th Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, San Diego, CA, Aug. 9–11, 1982, Paper No. 82–1370.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anders, J.B., and Watson, R.D.: Airfoil Large-Eddy Breakup Devices for Turbulent Drag Reduction. AIAA Shear Flow Control Conference, Boulder, Colorado, March 12–14, 1985. Paper No. 85–520.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertelrud, A.: Full Scale Ejxperiments into the Use of Large-Eddy Breakup Devices for Drag Reduction on Aircraft. Paper presented at AGARD Symposium on Improvement of Aerodynamic Performance Through Boundary Layer Control and High Lift Systems, Brussels, Belgium, May 1984.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKeough, P.J., and Graham, J.M.R.: The Effect of Mean Loading on the Fluctuating Loads Induced on Aerofoils by a Turbulent Stream. Aeronautical Quarterly, Feb. 1980, pp. 56–68.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balakumar, P., and Widnall, S.E.: Application of Unsteady Aerodynamics to Large-Eddy Breakup Devices in a Turbulent Flow. Phys. Fluids 29 (6), June 1986, pp. 1779–1787.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weihs, D., and Katz, J.: Transient Induced Drag. AIAA Journal Vol. 24, No. 7, 1986, pp. 1203–5.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuethe, A.M., and Chow, C.-Y.: Foundations of Aerodynamics - Bases of Aerodynamic Design. John Wiley and Sons, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bradshaw, P., Cebeci, T., and Whitelaw, J.H.: Engineering Calculation Methods for Turbulent Flows. Academic Press, London, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    South, J.C., jr., Doria, J.L., and Green, L.L.: FiniteVolume Scheme for Transonic Potential Flow About Airfoils and Bodies in an Arbitrarily-Shaped Channel. Paper Presented at 3rd Symposium on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flow, Long Beach, CA, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carlson, H.W., Shrouth, B.L., and Darden, C.M.: Wing Design With Attainable Leading-Edge Thrust Considerations. AIAA Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 22, No. 3, March 1985, pp. 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katzmayr, R.: Effect of Periodic Changes of Angle of Attack on Behaviour of Airfoils. NACA TM-147, 1922.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arild Bertelrud
    • 1
  • R. D. Watson
    • 2
  1. 1.High Technology CorporationHamptonUSA
  2. 2.NASA Langley Research CenterHamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations