Abstract
There are more than 31,000 general medical practitioners in the United Kingdom and they account for some 7% of the total cost of the British National Health Service [1]. Unfortunately, concern about the variable quality of general practice has persisted since the creation of the British National Health Service (e.g., [2-8]). Despite this concern, the Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) maintained a low profile until general practitioners themselves took steps to seek a consistently high quality of patient care.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dowson S, Maynard AK (1985) General practice. In: Harrison A, Gretton J Health care UK 1985. Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, London
Collings JS (1950) General practice in England today. Lancet i: p 555–585
Hadfield SJ (1953) A field survey of general practice 1951-1952. Br Med J ii: 683–706
Taylor S (1954) Good general practice. Oxford University Press for Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London
College of General Practitioners (1966) Evidence to the Royal Commission on Medical Education. Report from General Practice no 5, CGP, London
Royal College of General Practitioners (1977) Evidence to the Royal Commission on the National Health Services. J R Coll Gen Pract 27:197–206
Irvine DH (1976) Quality in general practice. In: McLachlan G (ed) A question of quality? Oxford University Press for Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London
Royal Commission on the National Health Services (1979) Report. HMSO, London
Irvine DH (1983) Quality of care in general practice: our outstanding problem. J R CoU Gen Pract 33:521–523
Royal College of General Practitioners (1985b) Quality in general practice. Policy Statement no 2. RCGP, London
Secretaries of State forcare: an agenda for discussion. HMSO, London
Royal College of General Practitioners (1985a) What sort of doctor? Report from General Practice no 23, RCGP, London
Irvine DH, Russell IT, Hutchinson A et al. (1986) Performance review in general practice: education development and evaluative research in the Northern Region. In: Pendleton DA, Schofield TPC, Marinker ML (eds) In pursuit of quality. Royal College of General Practitioners, London
UCLA Medical Care Review Organisation (1976) The atlas: UCLA EMCRO criteria mapping system. Center for Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
Russell IT (1983) The evaluation of computerised tomography: a review of research methods. In: Culyer AJ, Horisberger B (eds) Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Armitage P, Barry G (1987) Statistical methods in medical research (2nd edn). Blackwell, Oxford
Pritchard P, Low K, Whalen M (1984) Management in general practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Secretaries of State for Social Services, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland (1987) Promoting better health: the governments program for improving primary health care. Command 249, HMSO, London
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, I. et al. (1990). Performance Review in British Primary Health Care: An Epidemiological and Economic Evaluation. In: Bergerhoff, P., Lehmann, D., Novak, P. (eds) Primary Health Care. Health Systems Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83240-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83240-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18426-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83240-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive