Unbinding of Membranes

  • R. Lipowsky
  • S. Leibler
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 21)


Ordered lamellar phases are formed in many-component systems containing amphiphilic molecules. In these phases, roughly parallel lamellae or membranes are separated by a fluid medium. Examples are (i) phospholipid bilayers separated by water, and (ii) swollen bilayers separated by oil (or water). In the latter case, the membranes consist of thin layers of water (or oil) sandwiched between two monolayers of surfactant. Recent swelling and dilution experiments have shown /1–4/ that the membrane spacing can become large compared to the membrane thickness. During such swelling or dilution experiments, the membranes undergo an unbinding process from a state where they are bound together to a state where they are completely separated.


Renormalization Group Recursion Relation Interaction Versus Dilution Experiment Planar Membrane 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. Harbich and W. Helfrich, Chem.Phys.Lipids 36, 39 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.M. di Meglio, M. Dvolaitzky, L. Leger, and C. Taupin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1686 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Larche, J. Appell, G. Porte, P. Bassereau, and J. Marignan, Phys.Rev.Lett. 56, 1700 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.R. Safinya, D. Roux, G.S. Smith, S.K. Sinha, P. Dimon, N.A. Clark, and A.M. Bellocq, Phys.Rev.Lett. 57, 2718 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.P. Rand, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 10, 277 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces ( Academic Press, Orlando, Fla., 1985 )Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Helfrich, Z. Naturforsch. 33a, 305 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Lipowsky and S. Leibler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2541 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Leibler and R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. B. (in Press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Lipowsky and M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2411 (1986), and (to be published)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.F. Evans and B.W. Ninham, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 226 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.B. Schneider, J.T. Jenkins, and W.W. Webb, J.Physique 45, 1475 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Helfrich, Z. Naturforsch. 28c, 693 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.G. de Gennes and C. Taupin, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 2294 (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Sornette, presentation at this conferenceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Lipowsky, D.M. Kroll, and R.K.P. Zia, Phys. Rev. B27, 4499 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Brezin, B. Halperin, and S. Leibler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1387, (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Lipowsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1429 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B4, 3184 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eq. (20) and (21) of Ref. 8 contain several misprints, and the scale factors v and a1 have been absorbed in V and .Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Lipowsky and S. Leibler (to be published)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Roux, presentation at this conferenceGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Roux and C. Safinya, private communicationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Lipowsky
    • 1
  • S. Leibler
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für FestkörperforschungKFA JülichJülichFed. Rep. of Germany
  2. 2.Baker LaboratoryCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations