Skip to main content

Locating Texture and Object Boundaries

  • Conference paper
Pattern Recognition Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 30))

Abstract

Two models are given for the extraction of boundaries in digital images, one for discriminating textures and the other for discriminating objects. In both cases a Markov random field is constructed as a prior distribution over intensities (observed) and labels (unobserved); the labels are either the texture types or boundary indicators. The posterior distribution, i.e., the conditional distribution over the labels given the intensities, is then analyzed by a Monte-Carlo algorithm called stochastic relaxation. The final labeling corresponds to a local maximum of the posterior likelihood.

Research partially supported by Office of Naval Research contract N00014-86-K-0027 and National Science Foundation grant DMS-8401927.

Research partially supported by Office of Naval Research contract N00014-86-0037, Army Research Office contract DAAG29-83-K-0116, and National Science Foundation grant DMS-8352087.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Aarts and P. van Laarhoven, “Simulated annealing: a pedestrian review of the theory and some applications,” NATO Advanced Study Institute on Pattern Recognition: Theory and Applications, Spa, Belgium, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Besag, “Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems” (with discussion), J. Royal Statist. 5oc., Series B, 36, 192–236, 1974.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Besag, “On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures,” J. Royal Statist. Soc., Series B, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F.S. Cohen and D.B. Cooper, “Simple parallel hierarchical and relaxation algorithms for segmenting noncausal Markovian random fields,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.R. Cross and A.K. Jain, “Markov random field texture models,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., PAMI-5, 25–40, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.S. Davis, “A survey of edge detection techniques,” Cornput. Graphics Image Processing, 4, 248–270, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P.A. Devijver, “Hidden Markov models for speech and images,” Nato Advanced Study Institute on Pattern Recognition: Theory and Applications, Spa, Belgium, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Elliott and H. Derin, “Modelling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields,” to appear in IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel/., 6, 721–741, 1984

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Geman and S. Geman, “Bayesian image analysis,” in Disordered Systems and Biological Organization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Geman and D.E. McClure, “Bayesian image analysis: an application to single photon emission tomography,” 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Geman, S. Geman, and D.E. McClure, “Markov random field image models and their applications,” invited paper, Annals of Statistics, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.R. Hanson and E.M. Riseman, “Segmentation of natural scenes,” in Computer Vision Systems, Academic Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Marr and E. Hildreth, “Theory of edge detectors,” Proc. Royal Soc. B, 207, 187–207, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Marroquin, S. Mitter, and T. Poggio, “Probabilistic solution of ill-posed problems in computational vision,” Artif. Intell. Lab. TECH. REPORT, M.I.T., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.W. Murray, A. Kashko, and H. Buxton, “A parallel approach to the picture restoration algorithm of Geman and Geman on an SIMD machine,” to appear in Image and Vision Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Oja, “Texture subspaces,” NATO Advanced Study Institute: Theory and Applications, Spa, Belgium, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Possolo, “Estimation of binary Markov random fields,” preprint, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.D. Ripley, “Statistics, images, and pattern recognition,” Canadian J. of Statist., 14, 83–111, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geman, D., Geman, S., Graffigne, C. (1987). Locating Texture and Object Boundaries. In: Devijver, P.A., Kittler, J. (eds) Pattern Recognition Theory and Applications. NATO ASI Series, vol 30. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83069-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83069-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83071-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83069-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics