Advertisement

Update 1987 pp 263-270 | Cite as

Assessment of Myocardial Function

  • J. P. Goldstein
Part of the Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (UICM, volume 3)

Abstract

Evaluation of myocardial function remains a key factor in the assessment of the critically ill patient. In the intact circulation, cardiac output is determined by several factors, including loading conditions, heart rate and ventricular contractility. Preload represents the diastolic volume during ventricular filling which distends the relaxed ventricular wall. Afterload is essentially related to the pressure distributed around the ventricular wall during systole and therefore to the aortic blood pressure. Finally, intrinsic ventricular contractility represents the velocity of contraction and the shortening capacity of the ventricle [1]. Therefore, a low cardiac output can be due to a significant decrease in ventricular contractility, to a change in loading conditions, or to both. On the other hand, an increase in cardiac output during administration of pharmacological agent may be related to an increase in the inotropic state, to a reduction in afterload, to an increase in preload, or to a combination of these factors.

Keywords

Right Ventricle Stroke Work Intraventricular Pressure Series Elastic Element Inotropic State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sonnenblick EH, Strobeck JE (1977) Derived indexes of ventricular and myocardial function. N Engl J Med 296:978–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gleason WL, Braunwald E (1962) Studies on the first derivative of the ventricular pulse in man. J Clin Invest 41:80–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahler F, Ross J, O’Rourke RA, Covel JW (1975) Effects of changes in preload, afterload and inotropic state on ejection and isovolumic phase measures of contractility in the conscious dog. Am J Cardiol 35:626–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braunwald E, Ross J (1979) Control of cardiac performance. In: Berne RM (ed) Handbook of physiology, section 2: The cardiovascular system, Waverly Press Inc, Baltimore, pp 533–580Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quinones MA, Gaasch WH, Alexander JK (1976) Influence of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man. Circulation 53:293–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hassler GB, Rodigas PC, Collins RH et al (1985) Two-dimensional echocardiography in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90:430–440Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rushmer RF, Franklin DL, Ellis RM (1956) Left ventricular dimensions recorded by sono-cardiometry. Circ Res 4:684–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K (1986) Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationship by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation 73:586–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suga H, Sagawa K (1974) Assessment of absolute volume from diameter of the intact canine left ventricular cavity. J Appl Physiol 36:496–499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukos AA (1973) Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume rate of canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 32:314–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaseda S, Tomoike H, Ogata I, Nakamura M (1985) End-systolic pressure-volume, pressure-length, and stress-strain relations in canine hearts. Am J Physiol 249(Heart Circ Physiol 18):H648–H654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carabello BA, Spann JF (1984) The uses and limitations of end-systolic indexes of left ventricular function. Circulation 69:1058–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morris JJ, Hamm DP, Pellom GL, et al Quantitation of right and left ventricular contractile performance in response to global ischemia in the intact dog: The linear, load-independent relation between ventricular stroke work and end-diastolic dimension. Submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glower DD, Spratt JA, Snow ND et al (1985) Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: the concept of preload recruitable stroke work. Circulation 71:994–1009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moores WY, LeWinter MM, Long WB, Grover M, Mack R, Daily PO (1984) Sonomicrom-etry : Its application as a routine monitoring technique in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 38:117–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chitwood WR, Hill RC, Sink JD, Kleinman LH, Sabiston DC, Wechsler AS (1980) Measurement of global ventricular function in patients during cardiac operations using sonomi-crometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 80:724–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murphy CE, Goldstein JP, Salter DR, Morris JJ, Abd-Elfattah AS, Wechsler AS (1985) The selective effects of amrinone on right and left ventricular function. Surg Forum 36:287–289Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldstein JP, Salter DR, Murphy CE, Abd-Elfattah AS, Morris JJ, Wechsler AS (1986) The efficacy of blood versus crystalloid coronary sinus cardioplegia during global myocardial ischemia. Circulation 74 (suppl III):99–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Goldstein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations