Boundary Element Method Applied to 3D Optimum Design

  • A. Chaudouet-Miranda
  • F. El Yafi
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)


CETIM has developed a method to optimize the shape of bidimensional elastic structures using the Finite Element method to determine the mechanical behaviour of the component at each step of the algorithm. This method prooved to be very efficient and in now applied to three dimensional structures using the Boundary Element method as analysis tool. The principle of the shape optimization method is to repeatedly modify the shape of the structure according to the results of the previous analysis. These results are only evaluated on the moving boundary of the component according to the mechanical criterion selected. Furthermore technological constraints can be taken into account : geometrical and physical ones. The main advantage of the proposed method lies in the fact that no functional or gradient of functional with respect to the shape variable, needs to be computed.

Furthermore the use of the Boundary Element method avoids all problems related to volume meshes, especially those of their evolution at each iteration.

The first part of this paper describes the shape optimization method. Then considerations related to the use of the Boundary Element method are developed. Finally a simple example is presented.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Oda. “On a technique to obtain as optimum strength the shape by the finite element method”, Bull. JSME, 20, 160–167 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Umetani and S. Hirai. “An adaptive shape optimization method for structural material using the Growing-Reforming procedure”, Proc, Joint JSME-ASME Applied Mechanics Western conf. 359–365 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Schnack. “An optimization procedure for stress concentration by the finite element technique”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng, 14, 115–124 (1979).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.V. Baud. “Fillet profiles for constant stress” Product. Engng 5. 133–134 (1934).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Neuber. “Zur Optimierung der Spannungskonzentration”, in Continuum Mechanics and Related Problems of Analysis, NAUKA Moskow, 375–380 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U. Spörl. “Optimization of the surfaces of Elastic Structures using the Finite Element Method”, Int. FEM-Congress - Baden-Baden (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. El Yafi. “L’évolution d’un maillage bidimensionnel”. Rapport CETIM (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Chaudouet — M. Afzali — “CA.ST.OR 3D: Three-dimensional Boundary Element Analysis computor code”. 5th Int. Conf. on Boundary Elements — Hiroshima,(1983).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Timoshenko and Goodier. “Theory of elasticity”, Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Chaudouet-Miranda
    • 1
  • F. El Yafi
    • 1
  1. 1.CETIMSenlisFrance

Personalised recommendations