Skip to main content

Arms Control: Lessons Learned and the Future

  • Conference paper
Book cover Modelling and Analysis in Arms Control

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 26))

  • 100 Accesses

Abstract

In a fairly regular cycle over the last fifteen years the western public has been offered a standard view of arms control by western politicians, amplified by the western press typically in breathless reportage of arms control negotiations. This view is that the nuclear arms race is not nice, that somehow it should be halted and that whatever particular set-piece of summitry or further episode of complicated Geneva negotiation is imminent is the last, best hope of humanity to achieve that halt. The Reagan administration signalled public endorsement of this goal for arms control when it changed SALT to START: Limitation to Reduction. Is this view correct, either as an historical statement of past arms control or as a realistic prescription for arms control in the future? A picture, they say, is worth a thousand words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, L. and Dombey, N. (1985): X-Ray Lasers to Shoot Holes in the Test Ban Treaty? New Scientist, 19 Sept. 1985, pp. 30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperovitz, G. (1985): Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam, Appendix IV. London, pp. 328–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. (1980): Politics and Force Levels: The Strategic Missile Program of the Kennedy Administration. California

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, P. (1985): The Recovery of Trust. Medicine and War, 1, pp. 169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R, (1943): Patterns of Culture, Boston, pp. 184–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, B. (1985): Strategic Command and Control: Redefining the Nuclear Threat. Washington, D,C., pp, 286–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, P, (1983): The Command and Control of Nuclear Forces, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, McGeorge, Kennan, G., McNamara R, and Smith, G, (1982): Nuclear Weapons and the Atlantic Alliance, Foreign Affairs, 60, Spring 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, McGeorge (1984): The Unimpressive Record of Atomic Diplomacy, In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed,), p, 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.S. (1984): Current NATO Strategy: A Recipe for Disaster. In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed. )

    Google Scholar 

  • Creveld, M. van (1985): Command in War. Cambridge, Mass,, Ch. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz, L. (1975): The War against the Jews, 1933–45. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkin, R. and Krebs, R. (1975): Animal Signals: Information or Manipulation? In: Behavioral Ecology ( Krebs and Davies, Ed.). Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. (1979): The Road to Stalingrad: Stalin’s War with Germany. Vol. I. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J. (1983): The Road to Stalingrad: Stalin’s War with Germany. Vol. II. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1972): Germany’s Aims in the First World War. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, G. (1982): Hitler and the Final Solution. California

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L. (1981): The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. London, p. 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Garthoff, R.L. (1984): Worst-case assumptions: uses, abuses and consequences. In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed. ), pp. 98–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayler, N. (1984): A Commander-in-Chief’s Perspective on Nuclear Weapons. In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed. )

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblat, J. (1983): Arms Control Agreements: A Handbook. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe de Bellerive colloquium “Nuclear War, Nuclear Proliferation and their Consequences”, Press Conference 29 June 1985; L. Dunn, “The Non-Proliferation Treaty Review: An American Perspective” typscr. paper presented at Colloquium, p.11

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, A. (1983): Peace and Deterrence. Speech at Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 6 April 1982, Bureau of Current Affairs, Current Policy Document no. 383

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloran, R. (1982): Pentagon draws up first strategy for fighting a long nuclear war. New York Times, 29 May 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. (.1983 ): The Relevance of Traditional Strategy, The Forgotten Dimensions of Strategy, In: The Causes of Wars ( Howard ). London

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. (1978): War and the Liberal Conscience, Oxford, pp. 73–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.D. (1984); The Morality of Nuclear Deterrence, In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed. )

    Google Scholar 

  • Joll, J. (1984): The Origins of the First World War. London, p. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. (1982): The Nuclear Delusion: Soviet-American Relations in the Atomic Age. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. (1984): The State of US-Soviet Relations: Breaking the Spell. In: The Choice ( Prins, Ed,)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (1981): The Realities behind Diplomacy: Background Influences on British External Policy, 1865–1980, Pt. III. The Politics of Appeasement, 1919–39. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinkade, W.M. (1981): Arms Control: Negotiated Solutions. In: Cruise Missiles: Technology, Strategy and Politics (Betts, Ed. ), Washington, D.C., p. 326

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J.R. and Davies, N.B. (1975): Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, p. 295

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V.I. (1970): What is to be Done? Burning Questions of our Movement. Lenin, Selected Works, Vol. I. Moscow, p. 264

    Google Scholar 

  • MccGwire, M., Booth, K., McDonnell, J. (1975): Soviet Strategic Weapons Policy 1955–70. New York, pp. 468–502

    Google Scholar 

  • MccGwire, M. (1983): The Dilemmas and Delusions of Deterrence. In: Defended to Death (Prins, Ed. ), London, pp. 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • MccGwire, M. (1985): Deterrence: The Problem Not the Solution. SAIS Review, 5, ii, Summer/Fall 1985, pp. 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • MccGwire, M. (in press): Soviet Military Objectives. Appendix A: Development of the Strategic Rocket Forces. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, J. (1983): Nuclear Blackmail. In: Dangers of Deterrence: Philosophers on Nuclear Strategy ( Blake and Pole, Eds.). London, p. 84

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, A. (1976): The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race. New York, pp. 85–88

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Review of Books (1983): The Bishops and the Bomb.. New York,pp, 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Paskins, B. and Dockrill, M. (1979): The Ethics of War. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, J.C, (1984): We must avoid an arms race in space. In: The Choice: Nuclear Weapons versus Security (Prins, Ed.). London. Also under a different title (The Nuclear Crisis Reader), New York, 1984, pp. 65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, G., Ed, (1983): Defended to Death: A Study of the Nuclear Arms Race. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D.A. (1981): A Smoking Radiation Ruin at the End of Two Hours: Documents on American Plans for Nuclear War with the Soviet Union, 1954–55. International Security. Winter 1981–82,pp, 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaborg, G.T. (1981): Kennedy, Khrushchev and the Test Ban, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (1980): Doubletalk: The Story of the First Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. London, p. 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrunner, J.D, and Sigal, L.V., Eds. (1983): Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, S. (1979): Endgame: the Inside Story of SALT II. New York, p. 57

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, S. (1984): Deadly Gambits: The Reagan Administration and the Stalemate in Nuclear Arms Control. New York, pp. 99–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A.J.P. (1964): The Origins of the Second World War. London, pp. 25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, E.B. (1873): Primitive Culture Vol.1. London, p. 134

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S.G.P.O. (1964): Commencement Address at American University in Washington, D.C., 10 June 1963. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. J.F. Kennedy 1963. Washington, D.C., pp. 459–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1980): Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D. (1980): Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State. London, p. 242

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Prins, G. (1986). Arms Control: Lessons Learned and the Future. In: Avenhaus, R., Huber, R.K., Kettelle, J.D. (eds) Modelling and Analysis in Arms Control. NATO ASI Series, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82943-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82943-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82945-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82943-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics