Skip to main content

Significance and Limitations for Diagnostics and Follow-up

  • Conference paper
Therapeutic Strategies in Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancer

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 100))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging is now of a standard which permits it to have a substantial influence on the selection of therapy in many diseases. The spectrum of these diagnostic modalities comprises scintigraphy, angiography, sonography, CT scan, and now NMR, and the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed in this paper. The biological effect of ionizing radiation will not be considered in this evaluation, but only the diagnostic benefit and practicability of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnaud JP, Daly R, Adloff M (1982) Comparison of sonography and scintigraphy in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Radiol 63: 96–100

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berland LL, Lawson TL, Foley WD, Melrose BL, Chintapalli KN, Taylor AJ (1982) Comparison of pre-and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. AJR 138: 853–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beyer D, Friedmann G, Mödder U (1982) Leberdiagnostik mit bildgebenden Verfahren. Internist 23: 66–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Danielson K, Sheewy P, Stephens D, Hattery R, LaRusso N (1983) Computed tomography and peritoneoscopy for dectection of liver metastasies: Review of the Mayo Clinic experience. J Computer Assist Tomogr 7: 230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel MA, Marks DS, Sandler MA, Shetty P (1983) Differentiation of focal intrahepatic lesions with’Tc-red blood cell imaging. Radiology 146: 777–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiegler W, Schütz H, Claussen C, Schörner W, Felix R (1984) Herdförmige Lebererkrankungen–Vergleichsstudie Computertomographie, konventioneller Ultraschall, automatisierter Multisektorscanner ( Octoson ). Fortschr Röntgenstr 141: 71–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeny PC, Marks WM (1983) Computed Tomographic Arteriography of the liver. Radiology 148: 193–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerhardt P (1983) Indikation und Leistungsfähigkeit der Computertomographie in der chirurgischen Diagnostik. Dtsch Ärztebl 80: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerhardt P, Terwey B (1982) Computertomographie und Sonographie zur Metastasenerkennung. Verh Dtsch Krebs Ges 3: 359–372

    Google Scholar 

  10. Green B, Bree RL, Goldstein HM, Stanley C (1977) Greyscale ultrasound evaluation of hepatic neoplasms: patterns and correlations. Radiology 124: 203–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knopf DR, Torres WE, Fayman WJ, Pjsones PJ (1982) Liver lesions: Comparative accuracy of scintigraphy and computed tomography. AJR 138: 623–627

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kober B, Gamroth A, Kimmig B, Weber M, Hermann HJ, zum Winkel K (1984) Angio-CT in der Diagnostik von Lebermetastasen colorektaler Tumoren. Röntgenpraxis 37: 330–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LaBerge JM, Laing FC, Federle MP, Jeffrey RB, Lim RC (1984) Hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of resectability by computed tomography and ultrasound. Radiology 152: 485–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lunia S, Parthasarathy K, Bakshis, Bender M (1974) An evaluation of the Tc-99m sulfur colloid liver scintiscans and their usefulness in metastatic work-up: a review of 1424 studies. J Nucl Med 16: 62–65

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martinez CL, Navarro IA, Mengual P, Arbues J, Baringo T, Sosono F (1981) Scintigraphy and echotomography in the diagnosis of hepatic masses. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 60: 579–588

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mathieu D, Grenier P, Lardè D, Vasile N (1984) Portal vein involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT features. Radiology 152: 127–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Suziki M, Inoue K, Itoh H, Ida M, Takashima T (1983) Work in progress: Dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 146: 721–727

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Stark DB, Davis PL, Margulis AR, Kaufmann L, Crooks LE (1984) Hepatic tumors: Magnetic resonance and CT appearance. Radiology 150: 141–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi P, Rovighi L, Tipaldi L, Bompiani C, Simonetti G (1981) High-contrast enhancement of the liver in CT by repeated doses of contrast medium. Eur J Radiol 1: 126–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheu J, Sung J, Chen D, Yu J-Y, Wang T-H, Su C-T, Tsang Y-M (1984) Ultrasonography of small hepatic tumors using high-resolution linear-array real-time instruments. Radiology 150: 797–802

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith TJ, Kemeny MM, Sugarbaker PH, Jons AE, Vermess M, Shawker TA, Edwards BK (1982) Prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease. Ann Surg 195: 486–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Snow JH, Goldstein HM, Wallace S (1979) Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography and computer tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms. AJR 132: 915–918

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanyam BR, Balthazar EJ, Hilton S, Lefleur RS, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN (1984) Hepatocellular carcinoma with venous invasion: sonographic-angiographic correlation. Radiology 150: 793–796

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan DC, Taylor KJW, Gottschalk A (1978) The use of ultrasound to enhance the diagnostic utility of the equivocal liver scintigraph. Radiology 128: 727–732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor KJW, Carpenter DA (1975) Comparison of radioisotope and ultrasound examination in the investigation of hepatobiliary disease. In: White DN (ed) Ultrasound in medicine, vol 1. Plenum, New York, pp 159–167

    Google Scholar 

  26. Triller J, Fuchs WA (1980) Abdominale Sonographie. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 37–38

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vatter J, Brecht G, Franken T, Harder T (1984) Die Wertigkeit der Ultraschalluntersuchungen beim Screening von Lebermetastasen and von einer Leberbeteiligung bei malignen Systemerkrankungen. Fortschr Roentgenstr 140: 162–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vermess M, Lau HM, Adams MD, Hopkins RM, Hoey GB, Grimes G, Chatterji DC, Girton M, Doppman JL (1982) Biodistribution study of ethiodized oil emulsion 13 for computed tomography of the liver and spleen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6: 1115–1119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wallace S, Chuang VP (1982) The radiological diagnosis and management of hepatic metastases. Radiology 22: 56–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wittenberg J, Fineberg HV, Ferucci JF Jr, Simeone JF, Müller PR, van Sonnenberg E, Kirkpatrick RH (1980) Clinical efficiency of computed body tomography. AJR 134: 1111–1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerhardt, P., Just, M., Weidenhammer, K. (1986). Significance and Limitations for Diagnostics and Follow-up. In: Herfarth, C., Schlag, P., Hohenberger, P. (eds) Therapeutic Strategies in Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82635-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82635-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82637-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82635-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics