Abstract
Diagnostic imaging is now of a standard which permits it to have a substantial influence on the selection of therapy in many diseases. The spectrum of these diagnostic modalities comprises scintigraphy, angiography, sonography, CT scan, and now NMR, and the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed in this paper. The biological effect of ionizing radiation will not be considered in this evaluation, but only the diagnostic benefit and practicability of the method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arnaud JP, Daly R, Adloff M (1982) Comparison of sonography and scintigraphy in the detection of liver metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Radiol 63: 96–100
Berland LL, Lawson TL, Foley WD, Melrose BL, Chintapalli KN, Taylor AJ (1982) Comparison of pre-and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. AJR 138: 853–858
Beyer D, Friedmann G, Mödder U (1982) Leberdiagnostik mit bildgebenden Verfahren. Internist 23: 66–74
Danielson K, Sheewy P, Stephens D, Hattery R, LaRusso N (1983) Computed tomography and peritoneoscopy for dectection of liver metastasies: Review of the Mayo Clinic experience. J Computer Assist Tomogr 7: 230–234
Engel MA, Marks DS, Sandler MA, Shetty P (1983) Differentiation of focal intrahepatic lesions with’Tc-red blood cell imaging. Radiology 146: 777–782
Fiegler W, Schütz H, Claussen C, Schörner W, Felix R (1984) Herdförmige Lebererkrankungen–Vergleichsstudie Computertomographie, konventioneller Ultraschall, automatisierter Multisektorscanner ( Octoson ). Fortschr Röntgenstr 141: 71–74
Freeny PC, Marks WM (1983) Computed Tomographic Arteriography of the liver. Radiology 148: 193–197
Gerhardt P (1983) Indikation und Leistungsfähigkeit der Computertomographie in der chirurgischen Diagnostik. Dtsch Ärztebl 80: 1–12
Gerhardt P, Terwey B (1982) Computertomographie und Sonographie zur Metastasenerkennung. Verh Dtsch Krebs Ges 3: 359–372
Green B, Bree RL, Goldstein HM, Stanley C (1977) Greyscale ultrasound evaluation of hepatic neoplasms: patterns and correlations. Radiology 124: 203–208
Knopf DR, Torres WE, Fayman WJ, Pjsones PJ (1982) Liver lesions: Comparative accuracy of scintigraphy and computed tomography. AJR 138: 623–627
Kober B, Gamroth A, Kimmig B, Weber M, Hermann HJ, zum Winkel K (1984) Angio-CT in der Diagnostik von Lebermetastasen colorektaler Tumoren. Röntgenpraxis 37: 330–333
LaBerge JM, Laing FC, Federle MP, Jeffrey RB, Lim RC (1984) Hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment of resectability by computed tomography and ultrasound. Radiology 152: 485–490
Lunia S, Parthasarathy K, Bakshis, Bender M (1974) An evaluation of the Tc-99m sulfur colloid liver scintiscans and their usefulness in metastatic work-up: a review of 1424 studies. J Nucl Med 16: 62–65
Martinez CL, Navarro IA, Mengual P, Arbues J, Baringo T, Sosono F (1981) Scintigraphy and echotomography in the diagnosis of hepatic masses. Rev Esp Enferm Apar Dig 60: 579–588
Mathieu D, Grenier P, Lardè D, Vasile N (1984) Portal vein involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: Dynamic CT features. Radiology 152: 127–132
Matsui O, Kadoya M, Suziki M, Inoue K, Itoh H, Ida M, Takashima T (1983) Work in progress: Dynamic sequential computed tomography during arterial portography in the detection of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 146: 721–727
Moss AA, Goldberg HI, Stark DB, Davis PL, Margulis AR, Kaufmann L, Crooks LE (1984) Hepatic tumors: Magnetic resonance and CT appearance. Radiology 150: 141–147
Rossi P, Rovighi L, Tipaldi L, Bompiani C, Simonetti G (1981) High-contrast enhancement of the liver in CT by repeated doses of contrast medium. Eur J Radiol 1: 126–131
Sheu J, Sung J, Chen D, Yu J-Y, Wang T-H, Su C-T, Tsang Y-M (1984) Ultrasonography of small hepatic tumors using high-resolution linear-array real-time instruments. Radiology 150: 797–802
Smith TJ, Kemeny MM, Sugarbaker PH, Jons AE, Vermess M, Shawker TA, Edwards BK (1982) Prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease. Ann Surg 195: 486–491
Snow JH, Goldstein HM, Wallace S (1979) Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography and computer tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms. AJR 132: 915–918
Subramanyam BR, Balthazar EJ, Hilton S, Lefleur RS, Horii SC, Raghavendra BN (1984) Hepatocellular carcinoma with venous invasion: sonographic-angiographic correlation. Radiology 150: 793–796
Sullivan DC, Taylor KJW, Gottschalk A (1978) The use of ultrasound to enhance the diagnostic utility of the equivocal liver scintigraph. Radiology 128: 727–732
Taylor KJW, Carpenter DA (1975) Comparison of radioisotope and ultrasound examination in the investigation of hepatobiliary disease. In: White DN (ed) Ultrasound in medicine, vol 1. Plenum, New York, pp 159–167
Triller J, Fuchs WA (1980) Abdominale Sonographie. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 37–38
Vatter J, Brecht G, Franken T, Harder T (1984) Die Wertigkeit der Ultraschalluntersuchungen beim Screening von Lebermetastasen and von einer Leberbeteiligung bei malignen Systemerkrankungen. Fortschr Roentgenstr 140: 162–167
Vermess M, Lau HM, Adams MD, Hopkins RM, Hoey GB, Grimes G, Chatterji DC, Girton M, Doppman JL (1982) Biodistribution study of ethiodized oil emulsion 13 for computed tomography of the liver and spleen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6: 1115–1119
Wallace S, Chuang VP (1982) The radiological diagnosis and management of hepatic metastases. Radiology 22: 56–64
Wittenberg J, Fineberg HV, Ferucci JF Jr, Simeone JF, Müller PR, van Sonnenberg E, Kirkpatrick RH (1980) Clinical efficiency of computed body tomography. AJR 134: 1111–1120
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gerhardt, P., Just, M., Weidenhammer, K. (1986). Significance and Limitations for Diagnostics and Follow-up. In: Herfarth, C., Schlag, P., Hohenberger, P. (eds) Therapeutic Strategies in Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82635-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82635-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82637-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82635-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive