Advertisement

Computer-Aided Rating of Work Load When Applying MTM

  • F. M. Kühn
  • W. Laurig
Conference paper

Abstract

Users of Predetermined Motion Time-Systems like MTM are interested in more efficient human movements. They seldom consider the risk of mismatching the features of the task to the abilities of the workers and of increasing their load, and consequently the risk of creating fatigue and decreasing productivity. A pragmatic approach is proposed to derive indices of motor work load using the precise description of movements in the MTM-System. An appropriate computer-aided procedure, representing the first step towards an expert system for the ergonomic evaluation of work places, is currently tested in practice for objectifying the ergonomic evaluation of different designs of manual operations.

Keywords

Manual Operation Work Place Work Load Precise Description Planning Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. (1).
    Gilbreth, F.B. and L.M., “Process charts”, Transactions of A.S.M.E. 43 (1918) 1029–1050, cit. Barnes, R.M., Motion and Time Study ( John Wiley, New York, 1952 )Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Kerkhoven, C.L., Kennelly’s Law, Work Study and Industrial Engineering (1962) 48–60Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Kühn, F.M., Belastungsanalyse mit Mikrocomputer—Ein ergonomischer Ansatz auf der Grundlage eines Systems vorbestimmter Zeiten, REFA-Nachrichten 37 (1984) 4, 41–46Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Kühn, F.M., Laurig, W., Computer-Aided Assessment of Work Load Using Predetermined Motion Time-Systems, 9th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (Bournemouth, 1985, in press)Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Laurig, W., Gencoglu, M. and Luttmann, A., Der axiomatische Ansatz als Möglichkeit zur Lösung des methodologischen Problems der ergonomischen Belastungsprognose, Zbl. Arbeitsmedizin 33 (1983) 4, 130–136Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Laurig, W., Kühn, F.M., Schoo, Kl.-C1., An Approach to Assess Motor Work Load in Assembly Tasks by Use of Predetermined Motion Time-Systems, Appl. Ergonomics (1985, in press)Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Maynard, H.B., Stegemerten, G.J. and Schwab, J.L., Methods-Time Measurement (MacGraw-Hill, New York, 1948)Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Minter, A.L., The Measure of Activity of Manual Work, Ph.D. Thesis, University of London (1977)Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Salwiczek, P., Rechnergestützte Planung und Gestaltung manueller Arbeitsmethoden auf der Basis eines Systems vorbestimmter Zeiten, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI-Z. 16 (1982) 14Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Schwab, J.L., Methods-Time Measurement, in Maywald, H.B. (ed.), Industrial Engineering Handbook (MacGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London, 1956)Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Wilcock, R. and Mink, J.A., The International MTM Directorate Rehabilitation Project “A Study of Man and Work”, MTM-Journal 9 (1982) 2, 3–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. M. Kühn
    • 1
  • W. Laurig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für ArbeitsphysiologieUniversität DortmundDortmund 1Germany

Personalised recommendations