Skip to main content

Psychiatric Evaluation of Criminal Accused

  • Chapter
Psychiatry — Law and Ethics

Part of the book series: Medicolegal Library ((MEDICOLEGAL,volume 5))

  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

Sir John Wood, in the 55th Maudsley Lecture, discusses the impact of legal modes of thought upon the practice of psychiatry, and he notes that “the criminal process has turned increasingly to psychiatry to help to solve some of its own intractable problems” [7, p. 552]. The main topics concern issues of volition, free will, criminal responsibility, and competency to stand trial. These highly important philosophical and social issues are beyond the scope of this paper [8]. While these issues remain under debate, a system has been built for referring people accused of criminal acts for psychiatric evaluation. The description of this procedure and the characteristics of those involved is the topic of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bluestone H, Melella J, Baskin D (1981) A study of criminal defendants referred for multiple psychiatric examinations (regarding their competency to stand tria). Journal of Forensic Sciences 26 (2): 416–423

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonovitz JC, Bonovitz JS (1981) Diversion of the mentally ill into the criminal justice system: the police intervention perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry 138 (7): 973–976

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke G, Johnston N, Pogany E (1973) Factors affecting referral to determine competency to stand trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 130 (8): 870–875

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henn FA, Herjanic M, Vanderpearl RH (1977) Forensic psychiatry: anatomy of a service. Comprehensive Psychiatry 18 (4): 337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamb HR, Grant RW (1982) The mentally ill in an urban county jail. Archives of General Psychiatry 39:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leo S (1982) Is the system guilty. (A stunning verdict puts the insanity defense on trial). Time, 5 July, pp 25–26)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wood J (1982) The impact of legal modes of thought upon the practice of psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry 140: 551–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wootton B (1980) Psychiatry, ethics and the criminal law. British Journal of Psychiatry 136: 525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zadik, Y.Z. (1986). Psychiatric Evaluation of Criminal Accused. In: Carmi, A., Schneider, S., Hefez, A. (eds) Psychiatry — Law and Ethics. Medicolegal Library, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82574-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82574-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-15742-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82574-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics