Advertisement

Internal and Translational Energies of Molecules Desorbed by Electronic Transitions

  • Ken Snowdon
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Surface Sciences book series (SSSUR, volume 4)

Abstract

Atoms and monatomic ions ejected from surfaces following electronic transitions clearly possess translational kinetic energy, and often electronic excitation as well [1]. Several mechanisms have been proposed [2] to describe both how the initial state excitation could arise, and then survive for sufficient time for particle ejection to be a competitive de-excitation channel. These mechanisms are system specific, but all convert an initially bound system into a repulsive neutral, ionized, or excited configuration, the properties of which essentially define the kinetic energy and angular distribution, and electronic excitation of the ejected product. Several successful calculations of the translational energy distributions and angular distributions (or spot patterns) have been reported [3,4] and confirm the belief, derived from experimental evidence, that to first order the observed distributions reflect the initial system bond length and orientation distributions [5].

Keywords

Angular Distribution Orientation Distribution Rotational Energy Kinetic Energy Distribution Internal Energy Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N.H. Tolk, W.E. Collins, J.S. Kraus, R.L. Morris, T.R. Pian, M.M. Traum, N.G. Stoffen, G. Margaritondo: in “Desorption Induced by Electronic Transitions”, ed. N.H. Tolk et al. ( Springer, New York 1983 ) 156Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See for example “Desorption Induced by Electronic Transitions”, ed. N.H. Tolk et al. (Springer, New York 1983)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Janow, N. Tzoar: Surf. Sci. 69, 253 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Preuss: Surf. Sci. 94, 249 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.E. Madey: Surf. Sci.79, 575 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Bermudez: to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.C. Polanyi, N. Sathyamurthy, and J.L. Schreiber: Chem. Phys. 24, 105 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.R. Gentry: in “Atom-Molecule Collision Theory” ed. R.B. Bernstein ( Plenum, New York 1979 ) 391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.H. Miller: J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5386 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Snowdon, R. Hentschke, W. Heiland, P. Hertel: Z. Phys. 318A, 261 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.E. Thomas, W.H. Weinberg: J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1437 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Pfnür, D. Menzel, F.M. Hoffmann, A. Ortega, A.M. Bradshaw: Surf. Sci. 93, 431 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G Michalk, W. Moritz, H. Pfnür, D. Menzel: Surf. Sci. 129, 92 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Brenig: in “Desorption Induced by Electronic Transit-71s”, ed. N.H. Tolk et al. ( Springer, New York 1983 ) 90Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. Feulner, W. Riedl, D. Menzel: Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 986 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Snowdon
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachbereich PhysikUniversität OsnabrückOsnabrückFed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations