Systems for 3D Display in Medical Imaging
Three-dimensional display can be accomplished by simulating either of the two means of three-dimensional presentation in nature: reflection from object surfaces and self-luminous objects. Both forms of display benefit significantly from real-time interaction.
Reflective displays are produced by shaded graphics, which require raster graphics hardware: a frame buffer, scan-out components, and often a processor. Hardware to speed display transformations is presently becoming available. The structures of both the standard and fast systems will be described. Also briefly presented will be the design of interactive head or hand trackers for moving and pointing within a 3D image.
Self-luminous display can be produced for surface representations made by dots or lines or for space-filling grey-scale distributions. In both cases one may calculate one or more projections which may be presented at various times or to different eyes to achieve the percept of depth. Alternatively one may place all of the individual points in 3-space by appropriate optical maneuvers. Display systems for both projective and optically based 3D display will be described. The former category includes vector, point, and raster graphics systems. The latter includes holography and systems with rotating or vibrating screens or mirrors, most interestingly the varifocal mirror and rotating LED-panel systems.
KeywordsPhotography Olin Karen
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- B. Baxter, “3-D Viewing Device for Interpretation of Multiple Sections”, National Computer Conference, NCC-80: 437–440, 1980.Google Scholar
- G. Bishop, Self-Tracker: A Smart Optical Sensor on Silicon, Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Department of Computer Science, 1984a.Google Scholar
- G. Bishop and H. Fuchs, “The Self-Tracker”, Proc MIT VLSI Conf, Artech House, Dedham, MA, 1984b.Google Scholar
- P. J. Bos, P. A. Johnson, Jr., K. Rickey Koehler/Beran, Tektronix, Inc., “A Liquid- Crystal Optical-Switching Device (II cell)”, Proc. Soc. for Info. Disp.: 30, 1983.Google Scholar
- H. Fuchs and S. M. Pizer, “Systems for Three-Dimensional Display of Medical Images”, Proc Int Joint Alpine Symp on Med Comp Graphics and Image Commun and Clin Adv in Neuro CT/NMR, IEEE Comp Soc [IEEE Catalog No 84CH2006-5]: 1–6, 1984.Google Scholar
- G. T. Herman, “Computer Graphics in Medicine”, in this volume.Google Scholar
- D. G. Jansson and R. P. Kosowsky, “Display of Moving Volumetric Images”, Processing and Display of Three-Dimensional Data II, 507: 82–92, 1984.Google Scholar
- J. S. Lipscomb, “Motion Decomposition, Orthogonality, and Stereo Display in a Molecular Computer Graphics System”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 1983.Google Scholar
- W. M. Newman and Robert F. Sproull, Principles of Interactive Computer Graphics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
- J. Poulton, H. Fuchs, J. D.Austin, J. G. Eyles, J. H. Heinecke, C. Hsieh, J. Goldfeather, J. Hultquist, and S. Spach, “Implementation of a Full Scale Pixel-Planes System”, to appear in Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Research in VLSI, UNC-Chapel Hill, 1985.Google Scholar
- L. Sher, The SpaceGraph Display: The Utility of One More Dimension, internal paper, Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, 1980.Google Scholar
- I. E. Sutherland, “A Head-Mounted Three Dimensional Display”, Proc. Fall Joint Comp. Conf.: 757, 1968.Google Scholar