Advertisement

Picosecond Dynamics of Hot Dense Electron-Hole Plasmas in Crystalline and Amorphized Si and GaAs

  • P. M. Fauchet
  • A. E. Siegman
Conference paper
  • 126 Downloads
Part of the Springer Series in Chemical Physics book series (CHEMICAL, volume 38)

Abstract

The physics of highly excited semiconductors has recently been the subject of many studies, especially in connection with the problem of pulsed laser annealing. Careful experiments [1–3] have now been performed with the temporal resolution required to demonstrate that one single picosecond or femto-second pulse can produce melting at the surface of silicon. Since the carrier relaxation time is very short (≲1 ps), melting occurs during illumination with ~30 ps pulses, such as those available from doubled Nd:YAG lasers. Unfortunately, because even the very dense electron-hole plasma (EHP) produced by a strong visible pulse will cause only a small change in the reflectivity of a probe beam (at 1.06 pm), up to densities ~1021 cm−3, it is difficult to use time-resolved reflection measurements to obtain detailed information on the dynamics of the very dense and hot EHP just before melting occurs. In this paper, we present results obtained using a novel technique that allows us to study in more detail the plasma close to but below the melting phase transition in Si and GaAs.

Keywords

Excitation Technique Melting Threshold Visible Pulse Pulse Laser Anneal Carrier Relaxation Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.M. Liu, H. Kurz, and B. Bloembergen in Laser-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing of Materials Narayan, Brown and Lemons, eds. ( North-Holland, New York, 1983 ) pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. von der Linde and N. Fabricius, Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 991 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.V. Shank, R. Yen, and C. Hirlimann, Phys. Rev. Lett 50, 454 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.H. Auston, J.A. Golovchenko, and T.N.C. Venkatesan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 558 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.M. Fauchet, Zhou Guosheng and A.E. Siegman, in Ref. 1, pp. 205–210.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.M. Fauchet and A.E. Siegman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 1043 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Bergner, V. Bruckner, G. Kerstan and W. Norwick, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b)117 603 (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.G. Svantesson and N.G. Nilsson, J. Phys. C. Sol. St. Phys. 12, 3838 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.-A. Lompré, J.M. Liu, H. Rurz and B. Bloembergen, Appl. Phys. Lett, 44, 3 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I.W. Boyd, S.C. Moss, T.F. Boggess, and A.L. Smirl, to appear in Energy-Beam Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing Fan and Johnson, eds. ( North-Holland, 1984 ); P.M. Fauchet, unpublished data.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.M. Fauchet and A.E. Siegman, to appear in Ref. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. M. Fauchet
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. E. Siegman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer SciencePrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Edward L. Ginzton LaboratoryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations