Advertisement

Compression and Shaping of Femtosecond Pulses

  • A. M. Weiner
  • J. G. Fujimoto
  • E. P. Ippen
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Chemical Physics book series (CHEMICAL, volume 38)

Abstract

During the Past several years ultrashort pulse technology has advanced dramatically from the picosecond to the femtosecond time domain. The colliding-pulse modelocked (CPM) cw dye laser [1] is now a reliable source of pulses shorter than 100 fsec; and pulses from other laser systems are being compressed to similar durations by nonlinear optical fiber methods [2]. Fiber compression of amplified pulses from a CPM-based system has already been used to generate 30 fsec pulses [3]. In the first part of this paper we describe experiments in which this same combination of techniques has been extended to produce pulses as short as 16 fsec [4]. These pulses, with a center wavelength of about 625 nm, are comprised of only 8 optical cycles. Then, as an application for such ultrashort pulses, we describe tine-resolved reflectometry studies of multilayer dielectric mirror coatings. Dramatic pulse distortions can be observed after a single reflection from a broadband mirror. Finally, we discuss the use of transient four-wave mixing for pulse shortening and sharing at much higher power levels.

Keywords

Pulse Shape Ultrashort Pulse Incident Pulse Autocorrelation Trace Dielectric Mirror 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.L. Fork, B.I. Greene and C.V. Shank, Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 671 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Nikolaus and D. Grischkowsky, Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 228 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.V. Shank, R.L. Fork, R. Yen, R.H. Stolen, and MT Tomlinson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 761, (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.G. Fujimoto, A.M. Weiner and E.P. Ippen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 832 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.L. Fork, C.V. Shank and R.T. Yen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 223 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.J. Tomlinson, R.N. Stolen and C.V. Shank, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 81, 139 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.P. Ippen and C.V. Shank, in Ultrashort Light Pulses: Picosecond Techniques and Applications, S.L. Shapiro, ed. ( Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1977 ).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. De Silvestri, P. Laporta and O. Svelto, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-20, 533 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.G. Fujimoto and E.P. Ippen, Opt. Lett. 8, 446 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Yajima, Y. Ishida, and Y. Taira, Picosecond Phenomena II, R.M. Hochstrasser et al., eds. ( Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1980 ), 190.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.M. Weiner and É.P. Ippen, Opt. Lett. 9, 53 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.M. Weiner, S. De Silvestri and E.P. Ippen, “Femtosecond Dephasing Measurements Using Transient Induced Gratings”, also in this volume.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Weiner
    • 1
  • J. G. Fujimoto
    • 1
  • E. P. Ippen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Research Laboratory of ElectronicsMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations