Advertisement

General Introduction

  • Derek B. Ingham
  • Mark A. Kelmanson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Engineering book series (LNENG, volume 7)

Abstract

The mathematical formulation of many problems in physics and engineering involving rates of change with respect to two or more independent variables, leads either to a partial differential equation or to a set of such equations. These equations are supplemented by a set of prescribed boundary conditions to constitute a boundary value problem (BVP), the solution of which, in general, lies beyond the reach of analytical approaches. Consequently a variety of numerical schemes have been developed in order to provide approximate solutions to such BVP’s. Certainly the most widely used are the finite difference (FD) and finite element (FE) “space discretisation” techniques in which the governing partial differential equations are approximated by a set of discretised equations whose solution is subsequently obtained numerically at a finite number of prespecified points in the solution domain. An alternative approach, upon which the present work is based, has been to employ integral equation techniques, which are formulated so that the governing equations are solved only on the boundary of the required solution domain. Various such techniques were originally suggested in the latter half of the last century by Helmholtz [1], Kelvin [2] and Kirchoff [3], primarily for the study of wave propagation in unbounded media. In 1903, Fredholm [4] presented the first rigorous investigation of the existence and uniqueness of solutions to integral equations, although neither he nor his immediate successors envisaged the range of problems to which his formulations could be applied.

Keywords

Boundary Value Problem Boundary Integral Equation Solution Domain Integral Equation Method Biharmonic Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    HELMHOLTZ, H., Theorie der Luftschwingungen in Rohren mit offenen Enden, Crelle’s J., Vol.57, pp.1–72, 1860.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    RAYLEIGH, Lord, Theory of Sound, Dover, NYC, New York (Reprint), 1887.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    KIRCHOFF, G., Zur Theorie der Lichstrahlen, Berl.Ber., pp.641, 1882.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    FREDHOLM, I., Sur une classe d’equations fonctionelles, Acta. Math., Vol. 27, pp.365–390, 1903.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    PROUDMAN, J., A theorem in tidal dynamics, Phil. Mag., Vol. 49, pp.570–573, 1925.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    JASWON, M.A. and PONTER, A.R.S., An integral equation solution of the torsion problem, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Vol. A273, pp.237–246, 1963.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    JASWON, M.A., Integral equation methods in potential theory, I, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Vol. A275, pp.23.–32, 1963.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    SYMM, G.T., Integral equation methods in potential theory, II, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Vol. A275, pp.33.–46, 1963.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    JASWON, M.A. and SYMM, G.T., Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory and Elastostatics, Academic Press, London, 1977.MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SYMM, G.T., Treatment of singularities in the solution of Laplace’s equation by an integral equation method, National Physics Laboratory Report No. NAC31, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    INGHAM, D.B., HEGGS, P.J. and MANZOOR, M., The numerical solution of plane potential problems by improved boundary integral equation methods, J. Comput. Phys., Vol.42(1), pp.77–98, 1981.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    INGHAM, D.B., HEGGS, P.J. and MANZOOR, M., boundary integral equation analysis of transmission line singularities, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., Vol.MTT-29, pp.1240–1243, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    LANGLOIS, W.E., Slow Viscous Flow, MacMillan, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    RICHARDSON, S., A ‘stick — slip’ problem related to the motion of a free jet at low Reynolds numbers, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, Vol.67, pp.477–489, 1970.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    KELMANSON, M.A., An integral equation method for the solution of singular slow flow problems, J. Comput. Phys., Vol.51(1), pp.139–158, 1983.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MIR-MOHAMAD-SADEGH, A. and RAJAGOPAL, K.R., The flow of a non-newtonian fluid past projections and depressions, Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., Vo.47(3), pp.485–488, 1980.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MICHAEL, D.H., The separation of viscous liquid at a straight edge, Mathematika, Vol.5, pp.82–84, 1958.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MOFFATT, H.K., Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner, J. Fluid Mech., Vol.18(1), pp.1–18, 1964.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    WATSON, E., Private communication, 1981.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    DEAN, W.R. and MONTAGNON, P.E., On the steady motion of viscous liquid in a corner, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, Vol.45, pp.389–394, 1949.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    KELMANSON, M.A., Modified integral equation solution of viscous flows near sharp corners, Computers and Fluids, Vol.11(4), pp.307–324, 1983.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    PAN, F. and ACRIVOS, A., Steady flows in rectangular cavities, J. Fluid Mech., Vol.28(4), pp.643–655, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    BURGGRAF, O., Analytical and numerical studies on the structure of steady separated flows, J. Fluid Mech., Vol.24(1), pp.113–151, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    GUPTA, R.P., MANOHAR, M.M. and NOBLE, B., Nature of viscous flows near sharp corners, Computers and Fluids, Vol.9(4), pp.379–388, 1981.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DENNIS, S.C.R. and SMITH, F.T., Steady flow through a channel with a symmetrical constriction in the form of a step, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Vol.A372, pp.393–414, 1980.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    HOLSTEIN Jr., H. and PADDON, D.J., A singular finite difference treatment of re-entrant corner flows. Part 1: newtonian fluids, J. Non-newtonian Fluid Mech., Vol.8, pp.81–93, 1981.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    BRAMLEY, J.S. and DENNIS, S.C.R., The calculation of eigenvalues for the stationary perturbation of Poiseuille flow, J. Comput. Phys., Vol.47(2), pp.179–198, 1982.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    MANZOOR, M., Heat flow through extended surface heat exchangers, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, 1982.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    XANTHIS, L.S., BERNAL, M.J.M. and ATKINSON, C., The treatment of singularities in the calculation of stress intensity factors using the boundary integral equation method, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol.26(3), pp.285–304, 1981.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    KELMANSON, M.A., Solution of nonlinear elliptic equations with boundary singularities by an integral equation method, to appear in J. Comput. Phys., 1984.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    INGHAM, D.B., HEGGS, P.J. and MANZOOR, M., Boundary integral equation solution of nonlinear plane potential problems, IMA J. Num. Anal., Vol.1, pp.416–426, 1981.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    KHADER, M.S. and HANNA, M.C, An iterative boundary numerical solution for general steady heat conduction problems, Trans. ASME J. Heat. Transfer, Vol.103, pp.26–31, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    COULSON, C.A. and BOYD.T.J.M., Electricity, 2nd Edn, Longman, London, 1979.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    JOHNSON, L.W. and REISS, R.D., Numerical Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., USA, 1982.MATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    BKEBBIA, C.A. and WALKER, S., Boundary Element Techniques in Engineering, Butterworth, London, 1980.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    BREBBIA, C.A., TELLES, J.C.P. and WROBEL, L.C., Boundary Element Techniques: Theory and Applications in Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1984.MATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    LONGUET-HIGGINS, M.S. and COKELET, E.D., The deformation of steep surface waves on water. Part 1: a numerical method of computation, Proc. R. SOC Lond., Vol.A350, pp.1–26, 1976.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    KELMANSON, M.A., Boundary integral equation solution of viscous flows with free surfaces, J. Eng. Math., Vol.17(4), pp.329–343, 1983.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    RUSCHAK, K.J., A method for incorporating free boundaries with surface tension in finite element fluid flow simulators, Int. J. Num. Meth. in Engng., Vol.15, pp.639–648, 1980.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    PINKUS, O. and STERNLICHT, B., Theory of Hydrodynamic Lubrication, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1961.MATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    ALLAIRE, P.E., Design of journal bearings for high speed rotating machinery, Proc. Design Engrg. Conf., pp.45–84, Chicago, Illinois, (S.M.Rohde, C.J.Maday and P.E.Allaire, Eds.), ASME, 1979.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    KELMANSON, M.A., A boundary integral equation method for the study of slow flow in bearings with arbitrary geometries, to appear in Trans. ASME J. Tribology, 1984.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    CASTELLI,I.V. and SHAPIRO,W., Improved methods for numerical solutions of the general incompressible fluid film lubrication problem, Trans. ASME J. Lub. Tech., Vol.89, pp.211–218, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    BREWE, D.E., HAMROCK, B.J. and TAYLOR, C.M., Effect of geometry on hydrodynamic film thickness, Trans. ASME J. Lub. Tech., Vol.101, pp.231–239, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    HARGREAVES, D.J. and TAYLOR, C.M., The determination of lubricant flowrate from a static grooved rectangular thrust bearing using a stream function formulation, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., Vol.24(l), pp.51–53, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    WADA, S., HAYASHI, H. and MIGITA, M., Application of the finite element method to hydrodynamic lubrication problems. Part 1: infinite width bearings, Bull. JSME, Vol.14(77), pp.1222–1233, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    BOOKER, J.F. and HUEBNER, K.H., Application of finite element methods to lubrication: an engineering approach, Trans. ASME J. Lub. Tech., Vol.94, pp.313–323, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    HAYASHI, H. and TAYLOR, C.M., A determination of cavitation interfaces in fluid film bearings using finite elements analysis, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., Vol.22(6), pp.277–285, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    KAMAL, M.M., Separation in the flow between eccentric rotating cylinders, Trans. ASME J. Basic Engrg., Vol.D88, pp.717–724, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    DiPRIMA, R.C. and STUART, J.T., Flow between eccentric rotating cylinders, Trans. ASME J. Lub. Tech., Vol.94, pp.266–274, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    WENDLAND, W.L., Boundary element methods and their asymptotic convergence, Preprint no.690, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek B. Ingham
    • 1
  • Mark A. Kelmanson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematical StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations