Diagnostik: Nierenfunktion, Urodynamik, antegrade Pyelographie

  • M. Meyer-Schwickerath
Conference paper
Part of the Verhandlungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie book series (VBDGUROLOGIE, volume 35)

Zusammenfassung

Schon 1955 berichtete Goodwin über die ersten perkutanen Nierenfistelungen. Die Verbesserung der radiologischen und szintigraphischen Techniken, aber besonders die Realtime-Sonographie haben in den letzten Jahren das diagnostische und therapeutische Spektrum des Urologen erweitert bis hin zu den perkutanen Manipulationen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Amis ESJr, Pfister RC, Newhouse JH (1982) Resist- ances of various renal instruments used in ureteral perfu- sion. Radiology 143: 267–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chibber PJ, Chisholm GD, Hargreave TB, Merrick MV (1981) Technetium DMSA and the prediction of recovery in obstructive uropathy. Br J Urol 53: 492–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krueger RP, Ash JM, Silver MM, Kass EJ, Gilmour RF, Alton DJ, Gilday DI, Churchill BM (1980) Primary hydronephrosis. Assessment of diuretic renography, pelvis perfusion pressure, operative findings, and renal and ureteral histology. Urol Clin North Am 7: 231–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieberman RP, Crummy AB, Glass NR, Belzer FO (1981) Fine needle antegrade pyelography in the renal transplant. J Urol 126: 155–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyer-Schwickerath M, Ringert RH, Homann W (1983) Perkutane Darstellung ektoper Megaureteren. Urologe [A] 22: (im Druck).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Reilly PH, Lupton EW, Testa HJ, Shields RA, Carroll RNP, Charlton Edwards E (1981) The dilated nonobstructed renal pelvis. Br J Urol 53: 205–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sjödin JG, Holmlund DEW (1982) Effects of saline load, roentgen contrast medium and indomethacin on diuresis and pelvic pressure in the acute obstructed kidney. Br J Urol 54: 446–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suyder HMIII, Lebowitz RL, Colodny AH, Bauer SB, Retik AB (1980) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urol Clin North Am 7: 273–290.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas DFM, Agrawal M, Lai-din AZ, Eckstein HB (1982) Pelviureteric obstruction in infancy and childhood. A review of 117 patients. Br J Urol 54: 204–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weinstein BJ, Skolnick ML (1978) Ultrasonically guided antegrade pyelography. J Urol 120: 323–327.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wernecke K, Heckemann R, Rehwald U, Ringert RH (1983) Ultraschallgeführte antegrade Pyelographien bei Nierentransplantaten. Fortschr Roentgenstr 138 /6: 740–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitaker RH (1979) An evaluation of 170 diagnostic pressure flow studies of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 121: 602–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whitfield HN, Britton KE, Nimmon CC, Hendry WF, Wallace DMA, Wickham JEA (1981) Renal transit time measurements in the diagnosis of ureteric obstruction. Br J Urol 53: 500–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Witherow RO’N, Whitaker RH (1981) The predictive accuracy of antegrade pressure flow studies in equivocal upper tract obstruction. Br J Urol 53: 496–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zegel HG, Pollack HM, Banner MP, Goldberg BB, Arger PH, Mulhern C, Kurtz A, Dubbins P, Coleman B, Koolpe H (1981) Percutaneous nephrostomy: Comparison of sono-graphic and fluoroscopic guidance. AJR 137: 925–927PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Meyer-Schwickerath
    • 1
  1. 1.Urologische UniversitätsklinikEssen 1Deutschland

Personalised recommendations