Interactions of Bacterio- and Phyto-Plankton in Nutrient Cycling Within Eutrophic Heywood Lake, Signy Island

  • J. C. Ellis-Evans


Recent estimates of whole lake carbon budgets within eutrophic Heywood Lake and oligotrophic Sombre Lake, have revealed a significant disparity between production (as measured by 14C) and turnover values in the eutrophie system. Whereas the turnover of photosynthetically fixed C in Sombre Lake could be adequately explained in terms of bacterial decomposition, grazing, sedimentation and loss to the outflow, up to 70% of Heywood Lake production remained unexplained by the above processes. In Heywood Lake, carbon dioxide can become limiting to phytoplankton populations at certain periods of the production season. Bacterial breakdown of algal debris and extra-cellular products of photosynthesis (detected by 14C method) is too slow to generate the necessary levels of carbon dioxide, so a second extra-cellular DOC pool comprising small readily assimilable substrates was postulated. Using a variety of techniques, evidence was found to support this proposal. The possibility that N and P are also rapidly recycled was investigated using axenic algal cultures. Preliminary experiments indicated that bacteria were having a beneficial effect on algal production in both N and P-depleted environments. It is suggested that such mechanisms could explain the high production values recorded from enriched Antarctic lakes.


Photosynthetic Rate Phytoplankton Population Total Label Bacterial Decomposition British Antarctic Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cole JJ, Likens GE (1979) Measurements of mineralisation of phytoplankton detritus in an oligotrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr 24: 541–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellis-Evans JC (1981a) Freshwater microbiology in the Antarctic. 1. Microbial numbers and activity in oligotrophic Moss Lake. Bull Br Antarct Sury 54: 85–104Google Scholar
  3. Ellis-Evans JC (1981b) Freshwater microbiology in the Antarctic. 2. Microbial numbers and activity in nutrient-enriched Heywood Lake. Bull Br Antarct Sury 54: 105–121Google Scholar
  4. Ellis-Evans JC (1982) Seasonal microbial activity in Antarctic freshwater lake sediments. Polar Biology 1: 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawes I (1983a) Turbulent mixing and its consequences for phytoplankton development in two ice-covered Antarctic lakes. Bull Br Antarct Sury 60: 69–82Google Scholar
  6. Hawes I (1983b) Nutrients and their effects on phytoplankton populations in lakes on Signy Island, Antarctica. Polar Biology 2: 115–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoppe H-G (1977) Analysis of actively metabolising bacterial populations with the autoradiographic technique. In: Microbial Ecology of a Brackish Water Enviroment (Rheinheimer G., ed):171–196 Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalff J, Welch HE (1974) Phytoplankton production in Char Lake, a natural polar lake and in Meretta Lake, a polluted polar lake, Cornwallis Island, Northwest Territories. J Fish Res Board Can 31: 621–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Satoh Y, Hanya T (1976) Decomposition of urea by larger particulate fraction and the free bacteria fraction in a pond water. Int Rev Gesamten Hyrobiol 61: 799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Ellis-Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNERCCambridgeGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations