Advertisement

Decomposition and Nutrient Cycling in Rostkovia magellanica from Two Contrasting Bogs on South Georgia

  • G. J. Lawson
Conference paper

Summary

The chemical composition of Rostkovia magellanica tillers was contrasted between a eutrophic seepage slope-mire and a mesotrophic basin-bog. Tillers in the slope-mire have higher concentrations of Ca (+214%), K (+17%), N (+13%) and Fe (+6%) but lower concentrations of Na (−22%), Mg (−54%) and Mn (−24%) than those in the basin-bog. These differences generally reflect the higher levels of exchangeable nutrients and pH in peat from the seepage-slope. Five elements are removed from senescing leaves (in the order K > P > N > Na > Mg), whereas 3 are accumulated (Fe > Ca > Mn). At both sites, initially rapid loss of weight of litterbag content was halted over winter. Weight loss in the second summer was much faster on the seepage-slope. The content of mobile elements (K, P, N, Na) decreased considerably overall through leaching and decomposition, but N and P contents increased during the second summer at the slope and bog sites, respectively, and this may represent fungal activity. Litterbags composed of different age classeś of leaves remained chemically distinct from each other (with the exception of K) during the 15-month trial.

Keywords

Plant Fraction Moss Surface Initial Nutrient Concentration Pine Needle Litter Lycopodium Annotinum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen SE; Grimshaw HM; Parkinson JA; Quarmby C (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell, Oxford 563 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckman HO; Brady NC (1960) The nature of properties of soils. Macmillan, New York, 653 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Bocock KL; Gilbert OJW (1957) The disappearance of leaf litter under different woodland conditions. Plant Soil 9: 179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callaghan TV (1980) Age-related patterns of nutrient allocation in Lycopodium annotinum from Swedish Lapland. Oikos 35: 373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin FS; van Cleve K; Tieszen LL (1975) Seasonal nutrient dynamics of tundra vegetation at Barrow, Alaska. Arct Alp Res 7: 209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulson JC; Butterfield J (1978) An investigation of the biotic factors determining the rates of plant decomposition on blanket bog. J Ecol 66: 631–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crooke WM; Simpson WC (1971) Determination of ammonium in Keldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. J Sci Food Agric 22: 9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodman GT; Perkins DF (1959) Mineral uptake and retention in cottongrass (Eriophorum vaginatum L.). Nature 184: 467–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gosz JR; Likens GE; Borman FH (1973) Nutrient release from decomposition leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook forest, New Hampshire. Ecol Monogr 47: 173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heal OW; Latter PM; Howson G (1978) A study of the rates of decomposition of organic matter. In: Heal OW, Perkins DF (eds) Production ecology of British moors and montane grasslands. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Malmer M (1958) Chemical composition of mire plants and peat. Bot Not 11: 274–288Google Scholar
  12. Malmer N; Nihlgard B (1980) Supply and transport of mineral nutrients. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 30: 63–95Google Scholar
  13. Murphy J; Riley JP (1962) A modified soil solution method for the determination of phosphate in waters. An Chim Acta 27: 31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pratt RM; Smith RIL (1982) Seasonal trends in chemical composition of reindeer forage plants on South Georgia. Polar Biol 1: 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith RIL (1981) Types of peat and peat-forming vegetation on South Georgia. Br Antarct Sury Bull 53: 119–139Google Scholar
  16. Smith RIL; Walton DWH (1975) South Georgia, Subantarctic. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20: 399–423Google Scholar
  17. Smith VR (1977) The chemical composition of Marion Island soils, plants and vegetation. S Mr J Antarct Res 7: 28–39Google Scholar
  18. Staff H; Berg (1982) Accumulation and release of plant nutrients in decomposing Scots pine needle litter. Long term decomposition in a Scots pine forest II. Can J Bot 60: 1561–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swift MJ; Heal OW; Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford, 372 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Tamm CO (1954) Some observations on the nutrient turn-over in a bog community dominated by Eriophorum vaginatum L. Oikos 5: 189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Timmons DR; Holt RF; Latterell JJ (1970) Leaching of crop residues as a source of nutrients in surface runoff water. Water Resour Res 6: 1367–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walton DWH; Smith RIL (1979) The chemical composition of South Georgian vegetation. Br Antarct Sury Bull 49: 117–135Google Scholar
  23. Williams PA; Nes P; O’Connor KF (1977) Macro-element pools and fluxes in tall-tussock (Chinochloa) grasslands, Canterbury, New Zealand. NZJ Bot 15: 443–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Lawson
    • 1
  1. 1.Merlwood Research StationInstitute of Terrestrial EcologyGrange-over-Sands, CumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations