Cellulose Decomposition and Its Relationship to Nutrient Cycling at South Georgia

  • D. W. H. Walton


Data for cellulose decomposition at South Georgia in litter bags and cotton strips are combined with information on the cellulolytic activity of fungi to show that major differences in the rate of cellulose breakdown are possible. An explanation for this is offered in terms of plant growth form, micro-climate and substratum quality. Cellulose break-down is linked to nutrient cycling for particular species via the percentage element content in standing dead organic matter. It is suggested that at South Georgia decomposition is mediated via a different system to that described for Arctic communities.


Dead Leaf Tundra Ecosystem Cellulose Decomposition Dead Organic Matter Cotton Strip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aleksandrova VD (1980) The Arctic and Antarctic: Their division into geobotanical areas. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (1981) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliss LC (1979) Vascular plant vegetation of the Southern Circumpolar Region in relation to antarctic, alpine and arctic vegetation. Can J Bot 57: 2167–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bliss LC, Wielgolaski FE (eds) (1973) Proceedings of the conference on primary production and production processes. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Edmonton and OsloGoogle Scholar
  5. Callaghan TV, Smith RIL, Walton DWH (1976) The I.B.P. Bipolar Botanical Project. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 274: 315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleve KV (1974) Organic matter quality in relation to decomposition. In: Holding AJ, Heal OW, MacLean SF, Flanagan PW (eds) Soil Organisms and Decomposition in Tundra. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm pp 311–324Google Scholar
  7. Collins NJ (1976) Growth and population dynamics of the moss Polytrichum alpestre in the Maritime Antarctic. Oikos 27: 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowding P, Chapin F, Wielgolaski FE, Kirfeather P (1981) Nutrients in tundra ecosystems. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 647–683Google Scholar
  9. Flanagan PW, Bunnell FL (1980) Microflora activities and decomposition. In: Brown PC, Bunnell FL (eds) An arctic ecosystem: The coastal tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Dowden Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg pp 291–334Google Scholar
  10. Heal OW, Flanagan PW, French DD, MacLean SF (1981) Decomposition and accumulation of organic matter. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: A comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurst JL (1982) Biology of fungi on plants in the sub-Antarctic. Ph.D. thesis. University of Aston in Birmingham. 236 pp (unpublished)Google Scholar
  12. Latter PM, Howson G (1977) The use of cotton strips to indicate cellulose decomposition in the field. Pedobiologia 17: 145–155Google Scholar
  13. Pratt RM, Smith RIL (1982) Seasonal trends in chemical composition of reindeer forage plants on South Georgia. Pol Biol 1: 13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) (1975) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20Google Scholar
  15. Smith MJ (1983) The microbial ecology of Sub-Antarctic tundra soils. Ph.D. thesis. University of Surrey. 256 pp (unpublished)Google Scholar
  16. Smith RIL (1984) Vegetation. In: Laws RM (ed) Antarctic Ecology. Vol 1. Academic Press, London pp 61–161Google Scholar
  17. Smith RIL (1985) Growth and production of Poa flabellata of South Georgia in relation to soil nutrient status and exposure. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs (Proceedings of the 4th SCAR symposium on Antarctic biology). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith RIL, Walton DWH (1975) South Georgia, Subantarctic. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20: 399–424Google Scholar
  19. Walton DWH (1973) Changes in standing crop and dry matter production in an Acaena community on South Georgia. In: Bliss LC, Wielgolaski FE (eds) Primary production and production processes, Tundra Biome. Proceedings of the Conference, Dublin, Ireland, April 1973. University of Alberta Printing Services, Edmonton pp 185–190Google Scholar
  20. Walton DWH, Allsopp D (1977) A new test cloth for soil burial trials and other studies on cellulose decomposition. Int Biodeterior Bull 13: 112–115Google Scholar
  21. Walton DWH, Greene DM, Callaghan TV (1975) An assessment of primary production in a sub-Antarctic grassland on South Georgia. Bull Br Antarct Sury 41 /42: 151–160Google Scholar
  22. Walton DWH, Smith RIL (1979) The chemical composition of South Georgian vegetation. Bull Br Antarc Sury 49: 117–135Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. H. Walton
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNERCCambridgeGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations