Nutrient Cycles in Antarctic Marine Ecosystems
Studies of mineral cycling in the marine environment can be very informative in regard to understanding food web dynamics and general functioning of the ecosystem. Although emphasis is placed on the essential macro-and micro-elements, other mineral elements are also valuable tracers for various processes involving chemical transformations. Most chemical elements show a unique distribution pattern in the water column which reflects their biological and chemical reactivities and the rates at which they are resolubilized. Antarctic waters can be visualized as a giant chemostat, with nutrient rich water upwelling at the Divergence at high latitudes and the water ultimately downwelling at the Polar Front or the Sub-Tropical Convergence. In comparison with other major up-welling areas of the world, one would expect to find almost complete stripping of plant nutrients with time in the upper 50–100 m due to growth of phytoplankton. This condition of nutrient depletion would also be suggested by abundant data on rates of primary production in all sections of the Southern Ocean. Nitrate and phosphate, however, show only slight decreases in concentration in sections from close to the continent to close to the Sub-Tropical Convergence. This apparent contradiction has been explained by recent data which show that N is re-cycled 6–7 times in the euphotic zone before it settles out to deeper water as particulate organic N. These findings have focused attention on the nature of the food web which results in such very high rates of nutrient re-cycling in surface waters. Microbial populations seem to be the dominant organisms responsible for these transformations. With the exception of studies dealing with the distribution of silicon and related elements in the water column and sediments, little attention has been paid to questions of mineral cycling in Antarctic waters. Our understanding of the interaction between biological-physical-geochemical processes in the Antarctic is thus meagre in comparison with temperate and tropical waters.
KeywordsBiomass Nickel Urea Siliceous Cadmium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bröckel K von (1981) The importance of nanoplankton within the pelagic Antarctic ecosystem. Kiel Meeresforsch 5: 61–67Google Scholar
- Broecker WS, Penge TH (1982) Tracers in the sea. Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 690 ppGoogle Scholar
- Hart TJ (1934) On the phytoplankton of the South-west Atlantic and the Bellingshausen Sea, 1929–31. Discovery Rep 8: 1–268Google Scholar
- Hewes CD, Holm-Hansen O, Sakshaug E (1983) Nanoplankton and microplankton studies during the circumnavigation cruise. Ant J US 18: 169–171Google Scholar
- Holm-Hansen O, Foster TD (1981) A multidisciplinary study of the eastern Scotia Sea. Ant J US 16: 159–160Google Scholar
- Koike I, Rönner U, Holm-Hansen O (1981) Microbial nitrogen metabolism in the Scotia Sea. Ant J US 16: 165–166Google Scholar
- Kuramoto S, Koyama K (1982) Preliminary report of the oceanographic observations in the 22nd Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (1980–1981). Mem Natl Inst Polar Res Spec Issue 23: 5–12Google Scholar
- Mathisen OA, Macaulay MC (1983) The morphological features of a super swarm of krill, Euphausia superba In: Nemoto T, Matsuda T (eds) Proceedings of the Biomass Colloquium in 1982, Tokyo, Tokyo, pp 153–164Google Scholar
- Rönner U, Sörennson F, Holm-Hansen 0 (1983) Nitrogen assimilation by phytoplankton in the Scotia Sea. Polar Biol 2: 137–147Google Scholar
- Schaule BK, Patterson CC (1981) Lead concentrations in the northeast Pacific: Evidence for global anthropogenic perturbations. Earth Planet Sci Lett 54: 97–116Google Scholar
- Watanabe K, Nakajima Y (1982) Vertical distribution of chlorophyll a along 45°E in the Southern Ocean. Mem Natl Inst Polar Res Spec Issue 23: 73–86Google Scholar